Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32646854›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2020

Gideon Lasco, Jhaki Mendoza, Alicia Renedo, Maureen L Seguin, Benjamin Palafox, Lia M Palileo-Villanueva, Arianna Maever L Amit, Antonio L Dans, Dina Balabanova, Martin McKee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gideon LascoDepartment of Anthropology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines pdlasco@up.edu.ph.ORCID 0000-0002-6402-682X
Jhaki MendozaDepartment of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Alicia RenedoDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Maureen L SeguinLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4786-9400
Benjamin PalafoxLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3775-4415
Lia M Palileo-VillanuevaDepartment of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Arianna Maever L AmitDepartment of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0003-4571-400X
Antonio L DansDepartment of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Dina BalabanovaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Martin McKeeLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0121-9683
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of the Philippines Manila · PHAteneo de Manila University · PH

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_16026Wellcome Trust 200346/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnderstanding explanatory models is important for hypertension, a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke. This article aims to determine what adult patients with hypertension in the Philippines attribute their condition to, how these views might be explained and what the implications are for hypertension management.

methodsThis is a qualitative study drawing on 71 semistructured interviews (40 initial and 31 follow-up) and four focus group discussions with patients diagnosed with hypertension. The setting was urban and rural low-income communities in the Philippines.

resultsFour prominent perceived causes were identified-genetics, heat, stress and diet-for what patients refer to as 'high blood'. We propose a 'folk physiology' that rests on local understandings of blood and blood flow, draws from broader cultural notions of illness causation and accounts for a dynamic, non-chronic view of hypertension that in turn informs the health behaviours of those affected.

conclusionsBy understanding that hypertension is frequently seen not as a chronic constant condition but rather as an episodic one triggered by external influences, although in those genetically predisposed to it, it may be possible to address patient's beliefs and thus adherence to treatment.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsHypertensionAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePhilippinesQualitative ResearchRural Populationhealth systemshypertensionqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID32646854
PMCPMC7351273
OpenAlexW3042037970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.