SynthesisJournal of infection and public health2020
Systematic review of artificial intelligence techniques in the detection and classification of COVID-19 medical images in terms of evaluation and benchmarking: Taxonomy analysis, challenges, future solutions and methodological aspects.
Synthesis in Journal of infection and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07328997 (Exploration of Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Prediction Models for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Based on Radiographic Evaluations Assessed by Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 98 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Exploration of Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Prediction Models for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Based on Radiographic Evaluations Assessed by Artificial Intelligence
Who cites it
98 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Accuracy of artificial intelligence algorithms in predicting acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Automated COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis with medical imaging and who is publishing: a systematic review.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome for COVID-19 Lung Patients: A Biomedical Imaging Perspective.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2021Pooled it
- Digital imaging, technologies and artificial intelligence applications during COVID-19 pandemic.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2021Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Applications for COVID-19 in Intensive Care and Emergency Settings: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Applications Across Epidemiological Stages of Zoonotic Disease.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- An Integrated Mycobacterial CT Imaging Dataset with Multispecies Information.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Facial Recognition Algorithms: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
- Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence Models for Accurate Prescription Label Identification and Information Retrieval for the Elderly in Northern East of Thailand.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a deep learning-based framework for automated lung CT segmentation and acute respiratory distress syndrome prediction: a multicenter cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- A tree-based explainable AI model for early detection of Covid-19 using physiological data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Towards the Generation of Medical Imaging Classifiers Robust to Common Perturbations.BioMedInformatics · 2024Article
- Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in assistance to COVID-19 diagnosis: A scoping review on types and evaluation methods.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Medical image fusion based on machine learning for health diagnosis and monitoring of colorectal cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- AI-enabled pipeline for virus detection, validation, and SNP discovery from next-generation sequencing data.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Real-Time Robotic Presentation Skill Scoring Using Multi-Model Analysis and Fuzzy Delphi-Analytic Hierarchy Process.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automatic diagnosis of COVID-19 from CT images using CycleGAN and transfer learning.Applied soft computing · 2023Article
- A survey of machine learning-based methods for COVID-19 medical image analysis.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023Review
- Emerging technologies for COVID (ET-CoV) detection and diagnosis: Recent advancements, applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2023Review
- Harnessing Machine Learning in Early COVID-19 Detection and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.Cureus · 2023Review
38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a systematic review of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques used in the detection and classification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) medical images in terms of evaluation and benchmarking. Five reliable databases, namely, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Scopus were used to obtain relevant studies of the given topic. Several filtering and scanning stages were performed according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria to screen the 36 studies obtained; however, only 11 studies met the criteria. Taxonomy was performed, and the 11 studies were classified on the basis of two categories, namely, review and research studies. Then, a deep analysis and critical review were performed to highlight the challenges and critical gaps outlined in the academic literature of the given subject. Results showed that no relevant study evaluated and benchmarked AI techniques utilised in classification tasks (i.e. binary, multi-class, multi-labelled and hierarchical classifications) of COVID-19 medical images. In case evaluation and benchmarking will be conducted, three future challenges will be encountered, namely, multiple evaluation criteria within each classification task, trade-off amongst criteria and importance of these criteria. According to the discussed future challenges, the process of evaluation and benchmarking AI techniques used in the classification of COVID-19 medical images considered multi-complex attribute problems. Thus, adopting multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is an essential and effective approach to tackle the problem complexity. Moreover, this study proposes a detailed methodology for the evaluation and benchmarking of AI techniques used in all classification tasks of COVID-19 medical images as future directions; such methodology is presented on the basis of three sequential phases. Firstly, the identification procedure for the construction of four decision matrices, namely, binary, multi-class, multi-labelled and hierarchical, is presented on the basis of the intersection of evaluation criteria of each classification task and AI classification techniques. Secondly, the development of the MCDA approach for benchmarking AI classification techniques is provided on the basis of the integrated analytic hierarchy process and VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje methods. Lastly, objective and subjective validation procedures are described to validate the proposed benchmarking solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.