Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32646771›Full record

SynthesisJournal of infection and public health2020

Systematic review of artificial intelligence techniques in the detection and classification of COVID-19 medical images in terms of evaluation and benchmarking: Taxonomy analysis, challenges, future solutions and methodological aspects.

O S Albahri, A A Zaidan, A S Albahri, B B Zaidan, Karrar Hameed Abdulkareem, Z T Al-Qaysi, A H Alamoodi, A M Aleesa, M A Chyad, R M Alesa and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of infection and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07328997 (Exploration of Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Prediction Models for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Based on Radiographic Evaluations Assessed by Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 98 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07328997 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Exploration of Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Prediction Models for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Based on Radiographic Evaluations Assessed by Artificial Intelligence

TypeobservationalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled400ConditionsARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), AI (Artificial Intelligence)ArmsCT scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Digital imaging, technologies and artificial intelligence applications during COVID-19 pandemic.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

O S AlbahriDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim 35900, Malaysia.
A A ZaidanDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim 35900, Malaysia. Electronic address: aws.alaa@gmail.com.
A S AlbahriInformatics Institute for Postgraduate Studies (IIPS), Iraqi Commission for Computers and Informatics (ICCI), Baghdad, Iraq.
B B ZaidanDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim 35900, Malaysia.
Karrar Hameed AbdulkareemCollege of Agriculture, Al-Muthanna University, Samawah 66001, Iraq.
Z T Al-QaysiDepartment of Computer Science, Computer Science and Mathematics College, Tikrit University, Tikrit, Iraq.
A H AlamoodiDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim 35900, Malaysia.
A M AleesaFaculty of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn, 86400, Batu, Pahat, Johor, Malaysia.
M A ChyadDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim 35900, Malaysia.
R M AlesaFaculty of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn, 86400, Batu, Pahat, Johor, Malaysia.
L C KemDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim 35900, Malaysia.
Muhammad Modi LakuluDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim 35900, Malaysia.
A B IbrahimDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim 35900, Malaysia.
Nazre Abdul RashidDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim 35900, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a systematic review of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques used in the detection and classification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) medical images in terms of evaluation and benchmarking. Five reliable databases, namely, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Scopus were used to obtain relevant studies of the given topic. Several filtering and scanning stages were performed according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria to screen the 36 studies obtained; however, only 11 studies met the criteria. Taxonomy was performed, and the 11 studies were classified on the basis of two categories, namely, review and research studies. Then, a deep analysis and critical review were performed to highlight the challenges and critical gaps outlined in the academic literature of the given subject. Results showed that no relevant study evaluated and benchmarked AI techniques utilised in classification tasks (i.e. binary, multi-class, multi-labelled and hierarchical classifications) of COVID-19 medical images. In case evaluation and benchmarking will be conducted, three future challenges will be encountered, namely, multiple evaluation criteria within each classification task, trade-off amongst criteria and importance of these criteria. According to the discussed future challenges, the process of evaluation and benchmarking AI techniques used in the classification of COVID-19 medical images considered multi-complex attribute problems. Thus, adopting multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is an essential and effective approach to tackle the problem complexity. Moreover, this study proposes a detailed methodology for the evaluation and benchmarking of AI techniques used in all classification tasks of COVID-19 medical images as future directions; such methodology is presented on the basis of three sequential phases. Firstly, the identification procedure for the construction of four decision matrices, namely, binary, multi-class, multi-labelled and hierarchical, is presented on the basis of the intersection of evaluation criteria of each classification task and AI classification techniques. Secondly, the development of the MCDA approach for benchmarking AI classification techniques is provided on the basis of the integrated analytic hierarchy process and VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje methods. Lastly, objective and subjective validation procedures are described to validate the proposed benchmarking solutions.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingDecision Support TechniquesArtificial IntelligenceBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRadiography, ThoracicSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligenceBenchmarkingCOVID-19Decision-makingEvaluationMCDAMedical image

Identifiers

PMID32646771
PMCPMC7328559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.