Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32646701›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular interventions2020

Prognostic Impact of Race in Patients Undergoing PCI: Analysis From 10 Randomized Coronary Stent Trials.

Mordechai Golomb, Björn Redfors, Aaron Crowley, Pieter C Smits, Patrick W Serruys, Clemens von Birgelen, Mahesh V Madhavan, Ori Ben-Yehuda, Roxana Mehran, Martin B Leon and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. How Sex and Race/Ethnicity Influence Interventional Cardiology Outcomes: What Do We Know?Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advancing Health Equity in the Cardiovascular Device Life Cycle.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025
    Review
  10. Population-Level Gaps in Coronary Artery Disease Care: A Focused Review.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Ethnic minorities treated with new-generation drug-eluting coronary stents in two European randomised clinical trials.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of Potential Racial Disparities in CYP2C19-Guided P2YClinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Pharmacogenetics of P2YPharmacotherapy · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Mordechai GolombClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.
Björn RedforsClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; Division of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Aaron CrowleyClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.
Pieter C SmitsMaasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Patrick W SerruysDepartment of Cardiology, NUIG, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland; Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Clemens von BirgelenDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Mahesh V MadhavanClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; Division of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Ori Ben-YehudaClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; Division of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Roxana MehranClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Martin B LeonClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; Division of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Gregg W StoneClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. Electronic address: gregg.stone@mountsinai.org.
Cardiovascular Research Foundation · USColumbia University · USImperial College London · GBMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NLNew York Hospital Queens · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess race-based differences in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from a large pooled database of randomized controlled trials.

backgroundData on race-based outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention are limited, deriving mainly from registries and single-center studies.

methodsBaseline characteristics and outcomes at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were assessed across different races, from an individual patient data pooled analysis from 10 randomized trials. Endpoints of interest included death, myocardial infarction, and major adverse cardiac events (defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to assess associations between race and outcomes, controlling for differences in 12 baseline covariates.

resultsAmong 22,638 patients, 20,585 (90.9%) were white, 918 (4.1%) were black, 404 (1.8%) were Asian, and 473 (2.1%) were Hispanic. Baseline and angiographic characteristics differed among groups. Five-year major adverse cardiac event rates were 18.8% in white patients (reference group), compared with 23.9% in black patients (p = 0.0009), 11.2% in Asian patients (p = 0.0007), and 21.5% in Hispanic patients (p = 0.07). Multivariate analysis demonstrated an independent association between black race and 5-year risk for major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio: 1.28; 95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 1.57; p = 0.01).

conclusionsIn the present large-scale individual patient data pooled analysis, comorbidities were significantly more frequent in minority-group patients than in white patients enrolled in coronary stent randomized controlled trials. After accounting for these differences, black race was an independent predictor of worse outcomes, whereas Hispanic ethnicity and Asian race were not. Further research examining race-based outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention is warranted to understand these differences.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanStentsAgedAsianComorbidityCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRace FactorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceprognosisracestent

Identifiers

PMID32646701
OpenAlexW3040220973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.