ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2020
Characteristics of Adults With Congenital Heart Defects in the United States.
Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of prior congenital heart surgery on coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Coronary Arterial Anomalies in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: From Detection to Management Strategies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- The burden and outcomes of vaccine-preventable infections among adult congenital heart disease patients: a nationwide analysis.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026Article
- Organizational Factors to Support Collaborative Care in Adult Congenital Heart Disease Programs.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Cardiorenal Biomarkers and Cerebrovascular Risk in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A New Era of Cardiothoracic Transplantation in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Emergency and Non-Referral Admissions as Predictors of Hospital Mortality Among Adults with Congenital Heart Diseases: A Nationwide Claim-Based Registry Study in Japan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- National Trends and Disparities in Congenital Heart Disease Mortality in the United States, 1999-2024.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Understanding gaps in guideline-recommended adult congenital heart disease care: Data from 12 US health care centers.American heart journal · 2026Article
- Toward Providing Equitable Care for Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: Where We Are and Where We Need to Be.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing to Improve Classification of Atrial Septal Defects in Electronic Health Records.Birth defects research · 2025Article
- Pharmacological management of heart failure in adults with congenital heart disease.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Health Insurance Status and Access to Healthcare Among Young Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: from the Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs and Well-beinG (CH STRONG), 2016-2019.Pediatric cardiology · 2024Article
- Age moderates change in disease-related stress among congenital heart disease survivors: a 6-year follow-up.European journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2024Article
- Review
- Neighborhood social deprivation and healthcare utilization, disability, and comorbidities among young adults with congenital heart defects: Congenital heart survey to recognize outcomes, needs, and well-being 2016-2019.Birth defects research · 2023Article
- A Computational Model of Ventricular Dimensions and Hemodynamics in Growing Infants.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2023Article
- Positive Predictive Value ofJournal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Reproductive Health of Women with Congenital Heart Defects.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the United States, >1 million adults are living with congenital heart defects (CHDs), but gaps exist in understanding the health care needs of this growing population.
objectivesThis study assessed the demographics, comorbidities, and health care use of adults ages 20 to 64 years with CHDs.
methodsAdults with International Classification of Disease-9th Revision-Clinical Modification CHD-coded health care encounters between January 1, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for Massachusetts) and December 31, 2010 were identified from multiple data sources at 3 U.S. sites: Emory University (EU) in Atlanta, Georgia (5 counties), Massachusetts Department of Public Health (statewide), and New York State Department of Health (11 counties). Demographics, insurance type, comorbidities, and encounter data were collected. CHDs were categorized as severe or not severe, excluding cases with isolated atrial septal defect and/or patent foramen ovale.
resultsCHD severity and comorbidities varied across sites, with up to 20% of adults having severe CHD and >50% having ≥1 additional cardiovascular comorbidity. Most adults had ≥1 outpatient encounters (80% EU, 90% Massachusetts, and 53% New York). Insurance type differed across sites, with Massachusetts having a large proportion of Medicaid (75%) and EU and New York having large proportions of private insurance (44% EU, 67% New York). Estimated proportions of adults with CHD-coded health care encounters varied greatly by location, with 1.2 (EU), 10 (Massachusetts), and 0.6 (New York) per 1,000 adults based on 2010 census data.
conclusionsThis was the first surveillance effort of adults with CHD-coded inpatient and outpatient health care encounters in 3 U.S. geographic locations using both administrative and clinical data sources. This information will provide a clearer understanding of health care use in this growing population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.