Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32646500›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2020

Sweetened beverage taxes and changes in beverage price, imports and manufacturing: interrupted time series analysis in a middle-income country.

Andrea Teng, Viliami Puloka, Murat Genç, Ofeina Filimoehala, Catherine Latu, Mohulamu Lolomana'ia, Sutayut Osornprasop, Louise Signal, Nick Wilson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrea TengUniversity of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand. andrea.teng@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-6116-3941
Viliami PulokaUniversity of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4531-4666
Murat GençUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5443-2146
Ofeina FilimoehalaTonga Health Promotion Foundation (TongaHealth), Nuku'alofa, Tonga.ORCID 0000-0002-0592-4953
Catherine LatuFiji National University, Suva, Fiji.ORCID 0000-0001-6536-9333
Mohulamu Lolomana'iaTonga Customs, Nuku'alofa, Tonga.ORCID 0000-0001-9082-4780
Sutayut OsornprasopWorld Bank, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7377-8652
Louise SignalUniversity of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4715-6718
Nick WilsonUniversity of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5118-0676
University of Otago · NZAtenisi Institute · TOFiji National University · FJMinistry of Agriculture and Forestry and Food · TO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Pacific Island nation of Tonga (a middle-income country) introduced a sweetened beverage tax of T$0.50/L in 2013, with this increasing further in 2016 (to T$1.00/L), and in 2017 (T$1.50/L; US$0.02/oz). Given the potential importance of such types of fiscal intervention for preventing chronic disease, we aimed to evaluate the impact of these tax changes in Tonga.

methodsInterrupted time series analysis was used to examine monthly import volumes and quarterly price and manufacturing 1 year after each tax change, compared with a counterfactual based on existing trends. Autocorrelation was adjusted for when present, and adjustments were made for changes in GDP per capita, visitor numbers, season and T$/US$ exchange rate.

resultsIn the year after the 2013, 2016 and 2017 tax increases, the price of an indicator soft drink increased by 16.8% (95%CI: 6.3 to 29.6), 3.7% (- 0.6 to 8.3) and 17.6% (6.0 to 32.0) respectively. Imports of sweetened beverages decreased with changes of - 10.4% (- 23.6 to 9.0), - 30.3% (- 38.8 to - 20.5) and - 62.5% (- 73.1 to - 43.4) respectively. Juice imports changed by - 54.2% (- 93.2 to - 1.1), and sachet drinks by - 15.5% (- 67.8 to 88.3) after the 2017 tax increase. Tonga water bottling (T$) increased in value by 143% (69 to 334) after the 2016 tax increase and soft drink manufacturing increased by 20% (2 to 46, albeit 5% market share).

conclusionsConsistent with international evaluations of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes, the taxes in Tonga were associated with increased prices, decreased taxed beverages imports, and increased locally bottled water.

Indexed as

TaxesCommerceInterrupted Time Series AnalysisSugar-Sweetened BeveragesTongaEvaluationNatural experimentPacificQuasi experimentSoft drinkSugar-sweetened beveragesSugary drinksTaxesTime-seriesTongaTrade

Identifiers

PMID32646500
PMCPMC7350205
OpenAlexW3041555330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.