Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32646397›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Quitting the quitline: a qualitative study of patient experience of electronic referrals to quitlines.

Elizabeth L Albert, Jeanmarie C Rose, India J Gill, Susan A Flocke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Smoking Cessation Counseling in Practice: A Qualitative Analysis of Quitline Conversations in Queensland, Australia.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2024
    Article
  6. Implementation, Maintenance, and Outcomes of an Electronic Referral to a Tobacco Quitline Across Five Health Systems.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth L AlbertCenter for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7136, USA. ela@case.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3091-8771
Jeanmarie C RoseCenter for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7136, USA.
India J GillCenter for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7136, USA.
Susan A FlockeDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute IHS-1503-29879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of electronic referrals (eReferrals) to state quitlines (QLs) for tobacco-using patients is a promising approach for addressing smoking cessation on a large scale. However, QL contact, enrollment, and completion rates are low. The purpose of this study was to examine the eReferral to QL process from the patient's perspective in order to inform strategies for improving QL engagement.

methodsWe conducted interviews with 55 patients who agreed to an eReferral at a primary care visit to 1 of 8 safety-net community health centers in Cuyahoga County, Ohio (September 2017-August 2018). Interviews were designed to explore the experiences of three subgroups of patients who subsequently: 1) declined participation in the QL; 2) were unreachable by the QL; or 3) were enrolled in or had completed the QL program. Analysis was guided by a phenomenological approach designed to identify emergent themes.

resultsReasons for QL program non-completion included changing life circumstances and events making cessation unviable; misunderstandings about the QL; discomfort with telephonic counseling; perceived lack of time for counseling; cell phone barriers; and having already quit smoking. We found that some individuals who were no longer engaged with the QL still desired continued support from the QL.

conclusionsParticipants intentionally and unintentionally disengage from the QL for a wide variety of reasons, several of which are mediated by low socioeconomic status. Integrating QL care with community-based resources that address these mediators could be a promising strategy.

Indexed as

HotlinesReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedCounselingFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOhioPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchSmoking CessationTobacco SmokingPrimary careProgram useQualitative researchTobacco cessationTobacco quitlines

Identifiers

PMID32646397
PMCPMC7350715
OpenAlexW3041098505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.