Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32646380›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Patient and caregiver perspectives on early identification for advance care planning in primary healthcare settings.

Cynthia Kendell, Jyoti Kotecha, Mary Martin, Han Han, Margaret Jorgensen, Robin Urquhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding patient views and experiences of the IDENTIfication of PALLiative care needs (IDENTI-PALL): a qualitative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cynthia KendellCancer Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. cynthia.kendell@ccns.nshealth.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8858-1812
Jyoti KotechaDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Mary MartinDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Han HanDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Margaret JorgensenCancer Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Robin UrquhartCancer Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Frailty Network SIG2014-F-09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs part of a broader study to improve the capacity for advance care planning (ACP) in primary healthcare settings, the research team set out to develop and validate a computerized algorithm to help primary care physicians identify individuals at risk of death, and also carried out focus groups and interviews with relevant stakeholder groups. Interviews with patients and family caregivers were carried out in parallel to algorithm development and validation to examine (1) views on early identification of individuals at risk of deteriorating health or dying; (2) views on the use of a computerized algorithm for early identification; and (3) preferences and challenges for ACP.

methodsFourteen participants were recruited from two Canadian provinces. Participants included individuals aged 65 and older with declining health and self-identified caregivers of individuals aged 65 and older with declining health. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone. A qualitative descriptive analytic approach was employed, which focused on summarizing and describing the informational contents of the data.

resultsParticipants supported the early identification of patients at risk of deteriorating health or dying. Early identification was viewed as conducive to planning not only for death, but for the remainder of life. Participants were also supportive of the use of a computerized algorithm to assist with early identification, although limitations were recognized. While participants felt that having family physicians assume responsibility for early identification and ACP was appropriate, questions arose around feasibility, including whether family physicians have sufficient time for ACP. Preferences related to the content of and approach to ACP discussions were highly individualized. Required supports during ACP include informational and emotional supports.

conclusionsThis work supports the role of primary care providers in the early identification of individuals at risk of deteriorating health or death and the process of ACP. To improve ACP capacity in primary healthcare settings, compensation systems for primary care providers should be adjusted to ensure appropriate compensation and to accommodate longer ACP appointments. Additional resources and more established links to community organizations and services will also be required to facilitate referrals to relevant community services as part of the ACP process.

Indexed as

Clinical DeteriorationEarly DiagnosisPhysicians, Primary CareTerminal CareTerminally IllAdvance Care PlanningAgedAlgorithmsCanadaCaregiversFemaleHumansMaleNeeds AssessmentPatient PreferenceQuality ImprovementAdvance care planningElectronic medical recordEnd-of-life carePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID32646380
PMCPMC7350686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.