Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32646371›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2020

Objective validation of YouTube™ educational videos for the instruction of regional anesthesia nerve blocks: a novel approach.

George L Tewfik, Adam N Work, Steven M Shulman, Patrick Discepola

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05290974 (Comparison Between Self-directed Online Educational Material and Conventional Teaching in Acquiring Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia Skills for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block by Novice Performers), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05290974 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Between Self-directed Online Educational Material and Conventional Teaching in Acquiring Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia Skills for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block by Novice Performers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2022 to 2024Enrolled23ConditionsEducationArmsSelf exploring of available online material on supraclavicular brachial plexus block, Conventional in-person teaching on supraclavicular brachial plexus block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

George L TewfikDepartment of Anesthesiology, Rutgers, New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Ave., Newark, NJ, 07103, USA. glt31@njms.rutgers.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7410-6436
Adam N WorkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Rutgers, New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Ave., Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Steven M ShulmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Rutgers, New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Ave., Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Patrick DiscepolaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Rutgers, New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Ave., Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYouTube™ ("YouTube") is often used as an educational tool to instruct anesthesia providers on regional anesthesia nerve blocks. However, there is no current objective standard to assess the educational quality of these user-uploaded videos. A new approach was used to objectively validate these videos by comparing them to high quality educational sources for the seven most commonly used nerve blocks.

objectiveWe sought to evaluate the educational quality of user-uploaded videos when compared to the highest quality anesthesia society websites (NYSORA, ACEP, USRA).

methodsAfter reviewing the instructional material available for the seven most frequently conducted nerve blocks on high-quality reference websites, we documented the educational characteristics present including such things as indications, volume, anatomy, etc. Next we reviewed the five most popular videos on YouTube for each block (by views) and documented the presence or absence of these educational characteristics.

resultsEighteen educational characteristics were documented in the "high-quality" anesthesia society reference material. Correlation was sought between this material and YouTube videos. Although there were varying degrees of correlation between the high quality sources and the videos, rarely did YouTube videos contain as high a percentage of these educational characteristics as the well-established sources. Some videos contained very few of these important educational characteristics.

conclusionAlthough YouTube has been used an educational tool, we recommend that only high quality sources be used to teach or illustrate regional anesthesia nerve blocks.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionNerve BlockSocial MediaVideo RecordingAnesthesiologyEducation, Medical, ContinuingHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32646371
PMCPMC7344038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.