Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32645718›Full record

ArticleChemical senses2020

Temperature Is Sufficient to Condition a Flavor Preference for a Cold-Paired Solution in Rats.

Kristen E Kay, Laura E Martin, Kimberly F James, Sashel M Haygood, Ann-Marie Torregrossa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical senses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Stimulus temperature modulates the psychophysical dimensions of salt taste.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. ParabrachialeNeuro · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. TRPV1-Lineage Somatosensory Fibers Communicate with Taste Neurons in the Mouse Parabrachial Nucleus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristen E KayDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Laura E MartinDepartment of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Kimberly F JamesDepartment of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Sashel M HaygoodDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ann-Marie TorregrossaDepartment of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Funding

Salivary Protein Influence on Taste and FeedingR01DC016869 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI TORREGROSSA, ANN-MARIE · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that stimulus temperature modifies taste signaling. However, understanding how temperature modifies taste-driven behavior is difficult to separate as we must first understand how temperature alone modifies behavior. Previous work has suggested that cold water is more rewarding and "satiating" than warm water, and water above orolingual temperature is avoided in brief-access testing. We explored the strength of cold water preference and warm water avoidance by asking: (1) if cold temperature alone was sufficient to condition a flavor preference and (2) if avoidance of warm stimuli is driven by novelty. We addressed these questions using custom-designed equipment that allows us to monitor and maintain solution temperatures. We conducted two-bottle preference tests, after pairing Kool-Aid flavors with 10 or 40 °C. Rats preferred the flavor paired with cold temperature, both while it was cold and for 1 day while solutions were presented at 22 °C. We then examined the role of novelty in avoidance of 40 °C. Rats were maintained on 10, 22, or 40 °C water in their home cage to increase familiarity with the temperatures. Rats were then subject to a series of brief-access taste tests to water or sucrose at 10 to 40 °C. Rats that had 40 °C experience licked more to 40 °C water, but not sucrose, during brief-access testing. In a series of two-bottle preference tests, rats maintained on 40 °C water had a decreased preference for 10 °C water when paired opposite 40 °C water. Together, these data contribute to our understanding of orosensory-driven behavior with water at different temperatures.

Indexed as

Food PreferencesAnimalsFlavoring AgentsMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansSucroseTemperatureFlavoring AgentsSucrosetastetemperaturewater

Identifiers

PMID32645718
PMCPMC7545254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.