Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32645707›Full record

SynthesisPediatric research2021

Healthcare interventions improving and reducing quality of life in children at the end of life: a systematic review.

Veerle Piette, Kim Beernaert, Joachim Cohen, Nele S Pauwels, Anne-Lore Scherrens, Jutte van der Werff Ten Bosch, Luc Deliens

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. End of life care in paediatric settings: UK national survey.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Veerle Piette *End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University, Brussels Health Campus-Building K Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. veerle.piette@vub.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7689-5248
Kim Beernaert *End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University, Brussels Health Campus-Building K Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Joachim CohenEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University, Brussels Health Campus-Building K Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Nele S PauwelsKnowledge Centre for Health Ghent, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Ghent University, Entrance 42 (K3), 1st floor Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Anne-Lore ScherrensEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University, Brussels Health Campus-Building K Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Jutte van der Werff Ten BoschDepartment of Paediatrics, KidZ Health Castle Children's Hospital, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Dikke-Beuklaan 128, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Luc DeliensEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University, Brussels Health Campus-Building K Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with serious illness suffer from symptoms at the end of life that often fail to be relieved. An overview is required of healthcare interventions improving and decreasing quality of life (QOL) for children with serious illness at the end of life.

methodsA systematic review was performed in five databases, January 2000 to July 2018 without language limit. Reviewers selected quantitative studies with a healthcare intervention, for example, medication or treatment, and QOL outcomes or QOL-related measures, for example, symptoms, for children aged 1-17 years with serious illness. One author assessed outcomes with the QualSyst and GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) Framework; two authors checked a 25% sample. QOL improvement or reduction was categorized.

resultsThirty-six studies met the eligibility criteria studying 20 unique interventions. Designs included 1 randomized controlled trial, 1 cross-sectional study, and 34 cohort studies. Patient-reported symptom monitoring increased QOL significantly in cancer patients in a randomized controlled trial. Dexmedetomidine, methadone, ventilation, pleurodesis, and palliative care were significantly associated with improved QOL, and chemotherapy, stem cell transplant, and hospitalization with reduced QOL, in cohort studies.

conclusionsUse of patient-controlled symptom feedback, multidisciplinary palliative care teams with full-time practical support, inhalation therapy, and off-label sedative medication may improve QOL. Curative therapy may reduce QOL. IMPACT: QOL for children at the end of life may be improved with patient-controlled symptom feedback, multidisciplinary palliative care teams with full-time practical support, inhalation therapy, and off-label sedative medication. QOL for children at the end of life may be reduced with therapy with a curative intent, such as curative chemotherapy or stem cell transplant. A comprehensive overview of current evidence to elevate currently often-failing QOL management for children at the end of life. New paradigm-level indicators for appropriate and inappropriate QOL management in children at the end of life. New hypotheses for future research, guided by the current knowledge within the field. Various healthcare interventions (as described above) could or might be employed as tools to provide relief in QOL management for children with serious illness, such as cancer, at the end of life, and therefore could be discussed in pediatrician end-of-life training to limit the often-failed QOL management in this population, cave the one-size-fits-all approach for individual cases. Multidisciplinary team efforts and 24/7 presence, especially practical support for parents, might characterize effective palliative care team interventions for children with serious illness at the end of life, suggesting a co-regulating link between well-being of the child partly to that of the parents Hypothesis-oriented research is needed, especially for children with nonmalignant disorders, such as genetic or neurological disorders at the end of life, as well as QOL outcomes for intervention research and psychosocial or spiritual outcomes.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTerminal CareTerminally IllAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfant

Identifiers

PMID32645707
OpenAlexW3040721945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.