Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32645036›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Evaluation of the forum theatre approach for public engagement around antibiotic use in Myanmar.

Myo Maung Maung Swe, Phyu Hnin Hlaing, Aung Pyae Phyo, Htet Htet Aung, Frank Smithuis, Elizabeth A Ashley, Phaik Yeong Cheah

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Myo Maung Maung SweMyanmar Oxford Clinical Research Unit (MOCRU), Yangon, Myanmar.ORCID 0000-0002-6044-8718
Phyu Hnin HlaingMyanmar Oxford Clinical Research Unit (MOCRU), Yangon, Myanmar.ORCID 0000-0002-0004-2572
Aung Pyae PhyoMyanmar Oxford Clinical Research Unit (MOCRU), Yangon, Myanmar.ORCID 0000-0002-0383-9624
Htet Htet AungMyanmar Oxford Clinical Research Unit (MOCRU), Yangon, Myanmar.
Frank SmithuisMyanmar Oxford Clinical Research Unit (MOCRU), Yangon, Myanmar.
Elizabeth A AshleyMyanmar Oxford Clinical Research Unit (MOCRU), Yangon, Myanmar.
Phaik Yeong CheahNuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBMahidol University · THMyanmar Oxford Clinical Research Unit · MM

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 096527Wellcome Trust 106698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe risk of emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance is high in Southeast Asian countries and various strategies are being used to raise awareness about appropriate antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance within communities. Public engagement in science has not been widely practised in Myanmar. We describe the use of a forum theatre to engage with the community about antibiotic use.

methodsThe engagement activities took place in a peri-urban township in Yangon, Myanmar. Five preliminary story gathering workshops with the community were carried out to develop scripts and songs for the forum theatre. After that, we organised forum theatre plays between September and October 2018. Following each play we provided four simple key messages based on WHO's world antibiotic awareness week advocacy materials; 1) Antibiotics are medicines used to treat bacterial infections 2) Antibiotics are not useful for coughs and colds 3) Never use leftover antibiotics or share antibiotics with others 4) Prevent infections by regularly washing hands, preparing food hygienically, avoiding close contact with sick people, and keeping vaccinations up to date. We evaluated the engagement activities by conducting focus group discussions (FGD) with audience members.

resultsTen forum theatre plays were performed on two topics; "Fever and antibiotics" and "Mixed medicines", reaching 1175 community members. Four themes emerged from our thematic analysis: 1) Knowledge dissemination, 2) Enjoyment and fun, 3) Willingness to support and recommendations for future engagement activities and 4) Preference over traditional methods of health education. We found improvement of antibiotic related knowledge and enjoyment among audience who were also willing to support future engagement activities and preferred forum theatre approach over formal health talks.

conclusionsWe conclude that forum theatre is an effective innovative approach to engage and disseminate knowledge on appropriate use of antibiotics with the community in a participatory way.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsHumansMedication AdherenceMyanmarPatient Education as TopicPatient Medication KnowledgePatient ParticipationPlay and PlaythingsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID32645036
PMCPMC7347174
OpenAlexW3042215250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.