Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32644989›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

A spatio-temporal approach to short-term prediction of visceral leishmaniasis diagnoses in India.

Emily S Nightingale, Lloyd A C Chapman, Sridhar Srikantiah, Swaminathan Subramanian, Purushothaman Jambulingam, Johannes Bracher, Mary M Cameron, Graham F Medley

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Real-time monitoring of COVID-19 dynamics using automated trend fitting and anomaly detection.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily S NightingaleCentre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Disease and Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9265-1841
Lloyd A C ChapmanCentre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Disease and Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7727-7102
Sridhar SrikantiahCARE India, Patna, Bihar, India.
Swaminathan SubramanianVector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0804-0763
Purushothaman JambulingamVector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, Chennai, India.
Johannes BracherEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3777-1410
Mary M CameronDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Graham F MedleyCentre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Disease and Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0030-7278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe elimination programme for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in India has seen great progress, with total cases decreasing by over 80% since 2010 and many blocks now reporting zero cases from year to year. Prompt diagnosis and treatment is critical to continue progress and avoid epidemics in the increasingly susceptible population. Short-term forecasts could be used to highlight anomalies in incidence and support health service logistics. The model which best fits the data is not necessarily most useful for prediction, yet little empirical work has been done to investigate the balance between fit and predictive performance. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe developed statistical models of monthly VL case counts at block level. By evaluating a set of randomly-generated models, we found that fit and one-month-ahead prediction were strongly correlated and that rolling updates to model parameters as data accrued were not crucial for accurate prediction. The final model incorporated auto-regression over four months, spatial correlation between neighbouring blocks, and seasonality. Ninety-four percent of 10-90% prediction intervals from this model captured the observed count during a 24-month test period. Comparison of one-, three- and four-month-ahead predictions from the final model fit demonstrated that a longer time horizon yielded only a small sacrifice in predictive power for the vast majority of blocks. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The model developed is informed by routinely-collected surveillance data as it accumulates, and predictions are sufficiently accurate and precise to be useful. Such forecasts could, for example, be used to guide stock requirements for rapid diagnostic tests and drugs. More comprehensive data on factors thought to influence geographic variation in VL burden could be incorporated, and might better explain the heterogeneity between blocks and improve uniformity of predictive performance. Integration of the approach in the management of the VL programme would be an important step to ensuring continued successful control.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalDisease EradicationHumansIndiaLeishmaniasis, VisceralSpatio-Temporal Analysis

Identifiers

PMID32644989
PMCPMC7373294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.