ArticleJAMA network open2020
Association of Independent Prognostic Factors and Treatment Modality With Survival and Recurrence Outcomes in Breast Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and internal-external validation of statistical and machine learning models for breast cancer prognostication: cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Pooled it
- Restoring Tumor Cell Immunogenicity Through Ion-Assisted p53 mRNA Domestication for Enhanced In Situ Cancer Vaccination Effect.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Article
- Association of clinicopathologic and molecular factors with the occurrence of positive margins in breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Determinants of breast cancer among women attending oncology units in selected health facilities of Hawassa City, Sidama Region, Southern Ethiopia, 2023: case-control study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Prospective Study of Incidence and Impact of Comorbidities on Breast Cancer Survival from India.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Observational
- Article
- Carcinoma with signet ring cell differentiation associated with invasive breast cancer: A case report.Oncology letters · 2023Article
- DNA damage, demethylation and anticancer activity of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Locoregional tumor burden and risk of mortality in metastatic breast cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2022Article
- The Role of the 21-Gene Recurrence ScoreCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- Nontherapeutic Risk Factors of Different Grouped Stage IIIC Breast Cancer Patients' Mortality: A Study of the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database.The breast journal · 2022Article
- Comparison of the performance of four staging systems in determining the prognosis of breast cancer among women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Article
- TET2 and DNMT3A mutations and exceptional response to 4'-thio-2'-deoxycytidine in human solid tumor models.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2021Article
- Article
- Prospective Exploratory Analysis of Angiogenic Biomarkers in Peripheral Blood in Advanced NSCLC Patients Treated With Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy: The ANGIOMET Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Survival analysis across the entire transcriptome identifies biomarkers with the highest prognostic power in breast cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: It is not well understood whether prognostic factors in breast cancer are affected by specific treatment and vary by clinical outcome type compared with untreated patients. Objective: To identify independent clinical and molecular measurements associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) by homogeneous treatment in women with breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study included 956 patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from hospital centers across 4 geographical regions of the United States who participated in the accreditation program of the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons from 1985 to 1997. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1 to 282 months. The study analysis was conducted from June 10, 2019, to March 18, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Analysis of OS and RFS in patients who underwent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or endocrine therapy alone compared with no systemic or locoregional therapy. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate independent performance and 95% CI of age, tumor size, number of positive nodes (nodal status), tumor grades 2 and 3, p53 status, estrogen receptor (ER) status, and ERBB2 (formerly HER2) status. Results: Among 956 participants, median age was 61 (range, 25-96) years. Age (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 2.24; 95% CI, 1.27-3.94; P = .01) and high grade (AHR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.09-3.86; P = .02), in addition to nodal status and tumor size, were independently associated with OS and RFS, respectively, in untreated patients. p53 status (AHR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.07-4.18; P = .03) and ER status (AHR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23-0.92; P = .03) were associated with higher and lower risks of death, respectively, whereas nodal status (AHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.20; P < .005), high grade (AHR, 4.01; 95% CI, 1.51-10.70; P = .01), and ERBB2 positivity (AHR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.25-5.70; P = .01) were associated with the risk of recurrence after endocrine therapy. Tumor size (AHR for OS, 2.76 [95% CI, 1.79-4.31; P < .005]; AHR for RFS, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.23-4.18; P = .01]) and ERBB2 status (AHR for OS, 5.35 [95% CI, 1.31-21.98; P = .02]; AHR for RFS, 6.05 [95% CI, 1.48-24.78; P = .01]) were independently associated with radiotherapy outcomes, and nodal status was significantly associated with chemotherapy outcomes (AHR for OS, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02-1.09; P < .005]; AHR for RFS, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.09; P = .01]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, independent prognostic factors were associated with specific treatment and weighted by the outcome category with reference to untreated patients within biological and clinical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.