Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32644123›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2020

A critical analysis of methods used to investigate the cellular uptake and subcellular localization of RNA therapeutics.

Kirsten Deprey, Nefeli Batistatou, Joshua A Kritzer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Trials and Tribulations of MicroRNA Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Investigation of Sequence-Penetration Relationships of Antisense Oligonucleotides.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kirsten DepreyDepartment of Chemistry, Tufts University, 62 Talbot Ave, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Nefeli BatistatouDepartment of Chemistry, Tufts University, 62 Talbot Ave, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Joshua A KritzerDepartment of Chemistry, Tufts University, 62 Talbot Ave, Medford, MA 02155, USA.

Funding

Cell Penetration Profiling for BiotherapeuticsR01GM127585 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KRITZER, JOSHUA A · 2018 to 2022
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA therapeutics are a promising strategy to treat genetic diseases caused by the overexpression or aberrant splicing of a specific protein. The field has seen major strides in the clinical efficacy of this class of molecules, largely due to chemical modifications and delivery strategies that improve nuclease resistance and enhance cell penetration. However, a major obstacle in the development of RNA therapeutics continues to be the imprecise, difficult, and often problematic nature of most methods used to measure cell penetration. Here, we review these methods and clearly distinguish between those that measure total cellular uptake of RNA therapeutics, which includes both productive and non-productive uptake, and those that measure cytosolic/nuclear penetration, which represents only productive uptake. We critically analyze the benefits and drawbacks of each method. Finally, we use key examples to illustrate how, despite rigorous experimentation and proper controls, our understanding of the mechanism of gymnotic uptake of RNA therapeutics remains limited by the methods commonly used to analyze RNA delivery.

Indexed as

Aptamers, NucleotideCell NucleusCytosolGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic TechniquesHumansMicroRNAsMicroscopy, ElectronOligonucleotides, AntisenseRNARNA, Small InterferingSpectrometry, FluorescenceAptamers, NucleotideMicroRNAsOligonucleotides, AntisenseRNARNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID32644123
PMCPMC7430645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.