ArticleHuman brain mapping2020
Improved dynamic connection detection power in estimated dynamic functional connectivity considering multivariate dependencies between brain regions.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-base dynamic functional connectivity analysis of fMRI data during facial emotional processing.Brain imaging and behavior · 2025Article
- Explainable spatio-temporal graph evolution learning with applications to dynamic brain network analysis during development.NeuroImage · 2024Article
- Sliding window functional connectivity inference with nonstationary autocorrelations and cross-correlations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Classification of bipolar disorders using the multilayer modularity in dynamic minimum spanning tree from resting state fMRI.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Altered brain dynamic in major depressive disorder: state and trait features.Translational psychiatry · 2023Article
- Control energy assessment of spatial interactions among macro-scale brain networks.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Improved dynamic connection detection power in estimated dynamic functional connectivity considering multivariate dependencies between brain regions.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To estimate dynamic functional connectivity (dFC), the conventional method of sliding window correlation (SWC) suffers from poor performance of dynamic connection detection. This stems from the equal weighting of observations, suboptimal time scale, nonsparse output, and the fact that it is bivariate. To overcome these limitations, we exploited the kernel-reweighted logistic regression (KELLER) algorithm, a method that is common in genetic studies, to estimate dFC in resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data. KELLER can estimate dFC through estimating both spatial and temporal patterns of functional connectivity between brain regions. This paper compares the performance of the proposed KELLER method with current methods (SWC and tapered-SWC (T-SWC) with different window lengths) based on both simulated and real rs-fMRI data. Estimated dFC networks were assessed for detecting dynamically connected brain region pairs with hypothesis testing. Simulation results revealed that KELLER can detect dynamic connections with a statistical power of 87.35% compared with 70.17% and 58.54% associated with T-SWC (p-value = .001) and SWC (p-value <.001), respectively. Results of these different methods applied on real rs-fMRI data were investigated for two aspects: calculating the similarity between identified mean dynamic pattern and identifying dynamic pattern in default mode network (DMN). In 68% of subjects, the results of T-SWC with window length of 100 s, among different window lengths, demonstrated the highest similarity to those of KELLER. With regards to DMN, KELLER estimated previously reported dynamic connection pairs between dorsal and ventral DMN while SWC-based method was unable to detect these dynamic connections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.