Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32643753›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2020

Prospects for the accelerated improvement of the resilient crop quinoa.

Rosa L López-Marqués, Anton F Nørrevang, Peter Ache, Max Moog, Davide Visintainer, Toni Wendt, Jeppe T Østerberg, Christoph Dockter, Morten E Jørgensen, Andrés Torres Salvador and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Can quinoa (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Rosa L López-MarquésNovoCrops Centre, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Anton F NørrevangNovoCrops Centre, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Peter AcheInstitute for Molecular Plant Physiology and Biophysics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Max MoogNovoCrops Centre, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Davide VisintainerNovoCrops Centre, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Toni WendtCarlsberg Research Laboratory, J.C. Jacobsens Gade 4, Copenhagen V, Denmark.
Jeppe T ØsterbergCarlsberg Research Laboratory, J.C. Jacobsens Gade 4, Copenhagen V, Denmark.
Christoph DockterCarlsberg Research Laboratory, J.C. Jacobsens Gade 4, Copenhagen V, Denmark.
Morten E JørgensenCarlsberg Research Laboratory, J.C. Jacobsens Gade 4, Copenhagen V, Denmark.
Andrés Torres SalvadorThe Quinoa Company, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Rainer HedrichInstitute for Molecular Plant Physiology and Biophysics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Caixia GaoState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Sven-Erik JacobsenQuinoa Quality Aps, Teglværksvej 10, Regstrup, Denmark.
Sergey ShabalaInternational Research Centre for Environmental Membrane Biology, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Michael PalmgrenNovoCrops Centre, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKCarlsberg Laboratory · DKUniversity of Würzburg · DEChinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversidad San Francisco de Quito · ECUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crops tolerant to drought and salt stress may be developed by two approaches. First, major crops may be improved by introducing genes from tolerant plants. For example, many major crops have wild relatives that are more tolerant to drought and high salinity than the cultivated crops, and, once deciphered, the underlying resilience mechanisms could be genetically manipulated to produce crops with improved tolerance. Secondly, some minor (orphan) crops cultivated in marginal areas are already drought and salt tolerant. Improving the agronomic performance of these crops may be an effective way to increase crop and food diversity, and an alternative to engineering tolerance in major crops. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), a nutritious minor crop that tolerates drought and salinity better than most other crops, is an ideal candidate for both of these approaches. Although quinoa has yet to reach its potential as a fully domesticated crop, breeding efforts to improve the plant have been limited. Molecular and genetic techniques combined with traditional breeding are likely to change this picture. Here we analyse protein-coding sequences in the quinoa genome that are orthologous to domestication genes in established crops. Mutating only a limited number of such genes by targeted mutagenesis appears to be a promising route for accelerating the improvement of quinoa and generating a nutritious high-yielding crop that can meet the future demand for food production in a changing climate.

Indexed as

Chenopodium quinoaDroughtsPlant BreedingSalinitySalt StressChenopodium quinoadrought tolerancegenome editingmolecular breedingorphan cropssalt tolerance

Identifiers

PMID32643753
PMCPMC7501820
OpenAlexW3036790908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.