ArticleCroatian medical journal2020
"Questionable" peer review in the publishing pandemic during the time of COVID-19: implications for policy makers and stakeholders.
Article in Croatian medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- SARS/MERS/SARS-CoV-2 Outbreaks and Burnout Syndrome among Healthcare Workers. An Umbrella Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- The importance of peer review skills: Value and necessity of training residents to ensure continued scientific excellence.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- A survey of surveys: an evaluation of the quality of published surveys in neurosurgery.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Ibuprofen, other NSAIDs and COVID-19: a narrative review.Inflammopharmacology · 2023Review
- Efficacy and effectiveness of inactivated vaccines against symptomatic COVID-19, severe COVID-19, and COVID-19 clinical outcomes in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2023Article
- Evidence-based policies in public health to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.Future virology · 2023Review
- How COVID-19 Affected the Journal Impact Factor of High Impact Medical Journals: Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Research ethics committees: A forum where scientists, editors, and policymakers can cooperate during pandemics.Medicine, science, and the law · 2022Article
- Publication practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Expedited publishing or simply an early bird effect?Learned publishing : journal of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers · 2022Article
- Adjusting the use of preprints to accommodate the 'quality' factor in response to COVID-19.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2021Article
- Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2021Article
- Paper mills and on-demand publishing: Risks to the integrity of journal indexing and metrics.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2021Article
- Will evidence-based medicine be another casualty of COVID-19?Journal of advanced nursing · 2020Article
- Declaration of conflict of interest for reviewers in time of COVID-19 should be mandatory.Perspectives in clinical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
32643350PMC7358687What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.