Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32643314›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2021

Clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antidiabetic drugs: Results from a Japanese cohort study (JDDM53).

Hiroshi Maegawa, Yasushi Ishigaki, Jakob Langer, Ai Saotome-Nakamura, Marc Andersen, Japan Diabetes Clinical Data Management (JDDM) Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Impact of Participant Characteristics on Clinical Outcomes with iGlarLixi in Type 2 Diabetes: Post Hoc Analysis of SPARTA Japan.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hiroshi MaegawaDepartment of Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4611-8149
Yasushi IshigakiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2479-5752
Jakob LangerNovo Nordisk Pharma Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Ai Saotome-NakamuraNovo Nordisk Pharma Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Marc AndersenStatGroup ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Japan Diabetes Clinical Data Management (JDDM) Study Group
Iwate Medical University · JPShiga University of Medical Science · JPStatistics Denmark · DK

Funding

Novo Nordisk A/S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS/

introductionTreatment intensification is commonly delayed in people with type 2 diabetes, resulting in poor glycemic control for an unacceptable length of time and increased risk of complications. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study investigated clinical inertia in 33,320 Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) between 2009 and 2018, using data from the Computerized Diabetes Care (CoDiC

resultsThe median time from first reported glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol) to treatment intensification was considerably longer and HbA1c levels were higher the more OADs the patient was exposed to. For patients receiving three OADs, the median times from HbA1c ≥7.0% (53 mmol/mol) to intensification with OAD, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist or insulin were 8.1, 9.1 and 6.7 months, with a mean HbA1c level at the time of intensification of 8.4%, 8.9% and 9.3%, respectively. The cumulative incidence for time since the first reported HbA1c ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol) to intensification confirmed the existence of clinical inertia, identifying patients whose treatment was not intensified despite poor glycemic control. HbA1c levels ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol) after ≥6 months on one, two or three OADs were observed in 42%, 51% and 58% of patients, respectively, showing that approximately 50% of patients are above HbA1c target regardless of how many OADs they take.

conclusionsReal-world data here show clinical inertia in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes from early diabetes stages when they are receiving OADs, and illustrate a need for earlier, more effective OADs or injectable treatment intensification and better communication around the existence of clinical inertia.

Indexed as

Patient CompliancePatient ParticipationAdministration, OralAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsJapanMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesHypoglycemic AgentsAntidiabetic drugsDiabetes mellitus type 2Japanese adults

Identifiers

PMID32643314
PMCPMC7926254
OpenAlexW3041883832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.