ArticleProteomics. Clinical applications2020
Systematic Optimization of the iMALDI Workflow for the Robust and Straightforward Quantification of Signaling Proteins in Cancer Cells.
Article in Proteomics. Clinical applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sequencing of d/l-DNA and XNA by Templated-Synthesis.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Prospective on Imaging Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Diagnostics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023Review
- Systematic Optimization of the iMALDI Workflow for the Robust and Straightforward Quantification of Signaling Proteins in Cancer Cells.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeImmuno-MALDI (iMALDI) combines immuno-enrichment of biomarkers with MALDI-MS for fast, precise, and specific quantitation, making it a valuable tool for developing clinical assays. iMALDI assays are optimized for the PI3-kinase signaling pathway members phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and PI3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (p110α), with regard to sensitivity, robustness, and throughput. A standardized template for developing future iMALDI assays, including automation protocols to streamline assay development and translation, is provided. EXPERIMENTAL
designConditions for tryptic digestion and immuno-enrichment (beads, bead:antibody ratios, incubation times, direct vs. indirect immuno-enrichment) are rigorously tested. Different strategies for calibration and data readout are compared.
resultsDigestion using 1:2 protein:trypsin (wt:wt) for 1 h yielded high and consistent peptide recoveries. Direct immuno-enrichment (antibody-bead coupling prior to antigen-enrichment) yielded 30% higher peptide recovery with a 1 h shorter incubation time than indirect enrichment. Immuno-enrichment incubation overnight yielded 1.5-fold higher sensitivities than 1 h incubation. Quantitation of the endogenous target proteins is not affected by the complexity of the calibration matrix, further simplifying the workflow. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This optimized and automated workflow will facilitate the clinical translation of high-throughput sensitive iMALDI assays for quantifying cell-signaling proteins in individual tumor samples, thereby improving patient stratification for targeted treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.