Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32643291›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2021

Identification of optimal sample collection devices and sampling locations for the detection of environmental viral contamination in wire poultry cages.

Jongseo Mo, Erica Spackman, Christopher B Stephens

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jongseo MoSoutheast Poultry Research Laboratory, US National Poultry Research Center, USDA-ARS, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Erica SpackmanSoutheast Poultry Research Laboratory, US National Poultry Research Center, USDA-ARS, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4935-2360
Christopher B StephensSoutheast Poultry Research Laboratory, US National Poultry Research Center, USDA-ARS, Athens, Georgia, USA.
U.S. National Poultry Research Center · US

Funding

US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service 6040-32000-066-DUS Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 60-6040-6-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental testing of poultry premises after an outbreak of an infectious disease like avian influenza (AI) or Newcastle disease is essential to promptly verify virus-free status and subsequently return to normal operations. In an attempt to establish an optimized sampling protocol, a laboratory study simulating an AI virus-contaminated poultry house with wire layer cages was conducted. Three sample collection devices, pre-moistened cotton gauze, dry cotton gauze and a foam swab, were evaluated with each of four sample locations within a cage and when sampling all four locations with one device. Virus was detected with quantitative real-time RT-PCR utilizing a standard curve of a quantified homologous isolate of AI virus to determine titre equivalents of virus. The pre-moistened gauze detected the most virus RNA (100% positive, geometric mean titre [GMT): 3.2 log

Indexed as

ChickensHousing, AnimalAnimalsFemaleInfluenza A virusInfluenza in BirdsPoultry DiseasesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSpecimen HandlingRNA, Viralavian influenzaenvironmental samplinglayer cageNewcastle diseaseviruswire cage

Identifiers

PMID32643291
PMCPMC8247023
OpenAlexW3042007793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.