Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32643163›Full record

Trial reportHealth services research2020

Effects of a standardized community health worker intervention on hospitalization among disadvantaged patients with multiple chronic conditions: A pooled analysis of three clinical trials.

Aditi Vasan, John W Morgan, Nandita Mitra, Chang Xu, Judith A Long, David A Asch, Shreya Kangovi

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07279415 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Activate Tennessee: A CHW-Supported Program for Patient Activation

TypeinterventionalSponsorMeharry Medical CollegeRan2025 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsDiabetes, Hypertension, Cardio Vascular Disease, Infectious Diseases MorbidityArmsIntervention, Control Group
NCT07587073 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Evaluation of Enhanced Care Management With Community Supports, Transitional Care, and Residential Care Coordination for High-Risk Medi-Cal Members Under CalAIM in California

TypeinterventionalSponsorStratiHealthRan2026 to 2028Enrolled1,200ConditionsComplex Care, Post-Acute Care Utilization, Housing Instability, Residential Care TransitionArmsComprehensive CalAIM Care Bundle, Usual CalAIM Service Delivery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aditi VasanNational Clinician Scholars Program, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-8992-5672
John W MorganNational Clinician Scholars Program, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Nandita MitraLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Chang XuLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Judith A LongLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
David A AschLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Shreya KangoviLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Modifying Behavioral Response to Failure among Patients with Cardiovascular Disease Risk FactorsK23HL128837 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KANGOVI, SHREYA · 2016 to 2019
$695k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL128837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the effects of a standardized community health worker (CHW) intervention on hospitalization. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingPooled data from three randomized clinical trials (n = 1340) conducted between 2011 and 2016. STUDY

designThe trials in this pooled analysis were conducted across diseases and settings, with a common study design, intervention, and outcome measures. Participants were patients living in high-poverty regions of Philadelphia and were predominantly Medicaid insured. They were randomly assigned to receive usual care versus IMPaCT, an intervention in which CHWs provide tailored social support, health behavior coaching, connection with resources, and health system navigation. Trial one (n = 446) tested two weeks of IMPaCT among hospitalized general medical patients. Trial two (n = 302) tested six months of IMPaCT among outpatients at two academic primary care clinics. Trial three (n = 592) tested six months of IMPaCT among outpatients at academic, Veterans Affairs (VA), and Federally Qualified Health Center primary care practices. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsThe primary outcome for this study was all-cause hospitalization, as measured by total number of hospital days per patient. Hospitalization data were collected from statewide or VA databases at 30 days postenrollment in Trial 1, twelve months postenrollment in Trial 2, and nine months postenrollment in Trial 3. PRINCIPAL

findingsOver 9398 observed patient months, the total number of hospital days per patient in the intervention group was 66 percent of the total in the control group (849 days for 674 intervention patients vs 1258 days for 660 control patients, incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.66, P < .0001). This reduction was driven by fewer hospitalizations per patient (0.27 vs 0.34, P < .0001) and shorter mean length of stay (4.72 vs 5.57 days, P = .03). The intervention also decreased rates of hospitalization outside patients' primary health system (18.8 percent vs 34.8 percent, P = .0023).

conclusionsData from three randomized clinical trials across multiple settings show that a standardized CHW intervention reduced total hospital days and hospitalizations outside the primary health system. This is the largest analysis of randomized trials to demonstrate reductions in hospitalization with a health system-based social intervention.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCommunity Health WorkersFemaleHealth StatusHospitalizationHumansMaleMedicaidMental HealthMiddle AgedMultiple Chronic ConditionsPhiladelphiaPovertySingle-Blind MethodSocioeconomic Factorsaccess/demand/utilization of servicesdeterminants of health/population health/socioeconomic causes of healthinternal medicinesocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID32643163
PMCPMC7518822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.