ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021
Individualized SAR calculations using computer vision-based MR segmentation and a fast electromagnetic solver.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic resonance imaging.Science advances · 2026Review
- MR electrical properties mapping using vision transformers and canny edge detectors.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Local SAR management strategies to use two-channel RF shimming for fetal MRI at 3 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Effect of subject-specific head morphometry on specific absorption rate estimates in parallel-transmit MRI at 7 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- MARIE 2.0: A Perturbation Matrix Based Patient-Specific MRI Field Simulator.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023Article
- A Hybrid Volume-Surface Integral Equation Method for Rapid Electromagnetic Simulations in MRI.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023Article
- Bench to bore ramifications of inter-subject head differences on RF shimming and specific absorption rates at 7T.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2022Article
- Personalized local SAR prediction for parallel transmit neuroimaging at 7T from a single T1-weighted dataset.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Compression of volume-surface integral equation matrices via Tucker decomposition for magnetic resonance applications.IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation · 2022Article
- Safety and imaging performance of two-channel RF shimming for fetal MRI at 3T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe propose a fast, patient-specific workflow for on-line specific absorption rate (SAR) supervision. An individualized electromagnetic model is created while the subject is on the table, followed by rapid SAR estimates for that individual. Our goal is an improved correspondence between the patient and model, reducing reliance on general anatomical body models.
methodsA 3D fat-water 3T acquisition (~2 minutes) is automatically segmented using a computer vision algorithm (~1 minute) into what we found to be the most important electromagnetic tissue classes: air, bone, fat, and soft tissues. We then compute the individual's EM field exposure and global and local SAR matrices using a fast electromagnetic integral equation solver. We assess the approach in 10 volunteers and compare to the SAR seen in a standard generic body model (Duke).
resultsThe on-the-table workflow averaged 7'44″. Simulation of the simplified Duke models confirmed that only air, bone, fat, and soft tissue classes are needed to estimate global and local SAR with an error of 6.7% and 2.7%, respectively, compared to the full model. In contrast, our volunteers showed a 16.0% and 20.3% population variability in global and local SAR, respectively, which was mostly underestimated by the Duke model.
conclusionTimely construction and deployment of a patient-specific model is computationally feasible. The benefit of resolving the population heterogeneity compared favorably to the modest modeling error incurred. This suggests that individualized SAR estimates can improve electromagnetic safety in MRI and possibly reduce conservative safety margins that account for patient-model mismatch, especially in non-standard patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.