Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32643087›Full record

ReviewClinical oral investigations2021

Re-focusing on Agnathia-Otocephaly complex.

C Dubucs, N Chassaing, C Sergi, M Aubert-Mucca, T Attié-Bitach, D Lacombe, C Thauvin-Robinet, S Arpin, M J Perez, C Cabrol and 6 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.

C DubucsService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital Purpan, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
N ChassaingService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital Purpan, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
C SergiDepartment of Lab. Med. & Pathology (5B4.09), University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
M Aubert-MuccaService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital Purpan, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
T Attié-BitachUnité d'Embryofœtopathologie, Service d'Histologie Embryologie Cytogénétique, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France.
D LacombeService de Génétique Médicale, CRMR, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
C Thauvin-RobinetUMR1231 GAD, Inserm - Université Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France.
S ArpinService de Génétique Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France.
M J PerezDepartment of Medical Genetics, Reference Center for Developmental Abnormalities and Constitutional Bone Diseases, CHRU, Montpellier, France.
C CabrolCentre de Génétique Humaine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
C P ChenDepartment of Materials Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
J AzizaDépartement d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques, Institut Universitaire du cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
E ColinDepartment de Biochimie et Génétique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Angers, France.
J MartinovicUnit of Fetal Pathology, AP-HP Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart, France.
P CalvasService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital Purpan, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Julie PlaisanciéService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital Purpan, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France. plaisancie.j@chu-toulouse.fr.
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital Purpan · FRInserm · FRMing Chi University of Technology · TWUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité de franche-comté · FRUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAgnathia-otocephaly complex is a rare condition characterized by mandibular hypoplasia or agnathia, ear anomalies (melotia/synotia) and microstomia with aglossia. This severe anomaly of the first branchial arch is most often lethal. The estimated incidence is less than 1 in 70.000 births, with etiologies linked to both genetic and teratogenic factors. Most of the cases are sporadic. To date, two genes have been described in humans to be involved in this condition: OTX2 and PRRX1. Nevertheless, the overall proportion of mutated cases is unknown and a significant number of patients remain without molecular diagnosis. Thus, the involvement of other genes than OTX2 and PRRX1 in the agnathia-otocephaly complex is not unlikely. Heterozygous mutations in Cnbp in mice are responsible for mandibular and eye defects mimicking the agnathia-otocephaly complex in humans and appear as a good candidate. Therefore, in this study, we aimed (i) to collect patients presenting with agnathia-otocephaly complex for screening CNBP, in parallel with OTX2 and PRRX1, to check its possible implication in the human phenotype and (ii) to compare our results with the literature data to estimate the proportion of mutated cases after genetic testing. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this work, we describe 10 patients suffering from the agnathia-otocephaly complex. All of them benefited from array-CGH and Sanger sequencing of OTX2, PRRX1 and CNBP. A complete review of the literature was made using the Pubmed database to collect all the patients described with a phenotype of agnathia-otocephaly complex during the 20 last years (1998-2019) in order (i) to study etiology (genetic causes, iatrogenic causes…) and (ii), when genetic testing was performed, to study which genes were tested and by which type of technologies.

resultsIn our 10 patients' cohort, no point mutation in the three tested genes was detected by Sanger sequencing, while array-CGH has allowed identifying a 107-kb deletion encompassing OTX2 responsible for the agnathia-otocephaly complex phenotype in 1 of them. In 4 of the 70 cases described in the literature, a toxic cause was identified and 22 out the 66 remaining cases benefited from genetic testing. Among those 22 patients, 6 were carrying mutation or deletion in the OTX2 gene and 4 in the PRRX1 gene. Thus, when compiling results from our cohort and the literature, a total of 32 patients benefited from genetic testing, with only 34% (11/32) of patients having a mutation in one of the two known genes, OTX2 or PRRX1.

conclusionsFrom our work and the literature review, only mutations in OTX2 and PRRX1 have been found to date in patients, explaining around one third of the etiologies after genetic testing. Thus, agnathia-otocephaly complex remains unexplained in the majority of the patients, which indicates that other factors might be involved. Although involved in first branchial arch defects, no mutation in the CNBP gene was found in this study. This suggests that mutations in CNBP might not be involved in such phenotype in humans or that, unlike in mice, a compensatory effect might exist in humans. Nevertheless, given that agnathia-otocephaly complex is a rare phenotype, more patients have to be screened for CNBP mutations before we definitively conclude about its potential implication. Therefore, this work presents the current state of knowledge on agnathia-otocephaly complex and underlines the need to expand further the understanding of the genetic bases of this disorder, which remains largely unknown. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We made here an update and focus on the clinical and genetic aspects of agnathia-otocephaly complex as well as a more general review of craniofacial development.

Indexed as

Craniofacial AbnormalitiesJaw AbnormalitiesAnimalsHumansMiceMutationPhenotypeAgnathia-otocephaly complexCNBPCraniofacial developmentOTX2PRRX1Treacher–Collins syndrome

Identifiers

PMID32643087
OpenAlexW3042134821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.