Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32643062›Full record

SynthesisDrugs & aging2020

Medication Counselling in Older Patients Prior to Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review.

Andreas Capiau, Katrien Foubert, Lorenz Van der Linden, Karolien Walgraeve, Julie Hias, Anne Spinewine, Anne-Laure Sennesael, Mirko Petrovic, Annemie Somers, Belgian Society for Gerontology and Geriatrics (BSGG)

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs & aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas CapiauDepartment of Pharmacy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. Andreas.Capiau@UGent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-2458-5237
Katrien FoubertPharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Lorenz Van der LindenDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Karolien WalgraeveDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Julie HiasDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anne SpinewineLouvain Drug Research Institute, Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Anne-Laure SennesaelDepartment of Pharmacy, CHU UCL Namur, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.
Mirko PetrovicDepartment of Geriatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Annemie SomersDepartment of Pharmacy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Belgian Society for Gerontology and Geriatrics (BSGG)
Ghent University Hospital · BEKU Leuven · BEUCLouvain · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

Belgian Society for Gerontology and Geriatrics (BSGG) /
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder patients are regularly exposed to multiple medication changes during a hospital stay and are more likely to experience problems understanding these changes. Medication counselling is often proposed as an important component of seamless care to ensure appropriate medication use after hospital discharge.

objectivesThe purpose of this systematic review was to describe the components of medication counselling in older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) prior to hospital discharge and to review the effectiveness of such counselling on reported clinical outcomes.

methodsUsing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology (PROSPERO CRD42019116036), a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL was conducted. The QualSyst Assessment Tool was used to assess bias. The impact of medication counselling on different outcomes was described and stratified by intervention content.

resultsTwenty-nine studies were included. Fifteen different components of medication counselling were identified. Discussing the dose and dosage of patients' medications (19/29; 65.5%), providing a paper-based medication list (19/29; 65.5%) and explaining the indications of the prescribed medications (17/29; 58.6%) were the most frequently encountered components during the counselling session. Twelve different clinical outcomes were investigated in the 29 studies. A positive effect of medication counselling on medication adherence and medication knowledge was found more frequently, compared to its impact on hard outcomes such as hospital readmissions and mortality. Yet, evidence remains inconclusive regarding clinical benefit, owing to study design heterogeneity and different intervention components. Statistically significant results were more frequently observed when counselling was provided as part of a comprehensive intervention before discharge.

conclusionsSubstantial heterogeneity between the included studies was found for the components of medication counselling and the reported outcomes. Study findings suggest that medication counselling should be part of multifaceted interventions, but the evidence concerning clinical outcomes remains inconclusive.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringPatient DischargeAgedDatabases, FactualDirective CounselingHumansLength of StayPatient Medication Knowledge

Identifiers

PMID32643062
OpenAlexW3041447184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.