ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2021
Investigation of the significance of population-based breast cancer screening among women aged under 40 years.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The increasing prevalence of cancer in the elderly: An investigation of epidemiological trends.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOwing to low incidence rates, population-based breast cancer screening is not recommended by many municipalities in Japan for women aged < 40 years. To evaluate the usefulness of screening in women aged < 40 years, we investigated the results of population-based breast cancer screening among young women performed in the Ibaraki Prefecture.
methodsData regarding histological characteristics, recall rates, cancer detection rates, positive predictive values, tumor categories, and status of lymph node metastases were obtained from population-based screening data from Ibaraki Health Service Association Institute. The "number needing to be screened" (NNS) was determined; using Pearson's chi-squared test, these data were compared between women aged < 40 years and > 40 years.
resultsThe data of 428,560 women were evaluated. Cancer detection rates were significantly lower and the NNS and proportion of women with tumor category T2 or higher was significantly increased in women aged < 40 years than in those aged > 40 years (0.06% vs. 0.21%, 1505 vs. 281-439, and 28.9% vs. 6.3%, respectively; all, p < 0.05). The proportion of early-stage cancers was lower in women aged < 40 years than in those > 40 years, but this was not significant.
conclusionsThese results suggest that population-based breast cancer screening should not be recommended for women aged < 40 years. To reduce the breast cancer-related mortality rate in young women and ensure efficient use of limited medical resources in Japan, a more efficient surveillance system, based on genetic propensity and family history, needs to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32643018What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.