Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642992›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2020

A prospective study to validate the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)-induced dermatologic toxicities FACT-EGFRI 18 questionnaire: SWOG S1013.

Siu-Fun Wong, Joseph M Unger, James L Wade, Lynne I Wagner, Mario E Lacouture, Keisha C Humphries, Anna Moseley, Kathryn Arnold, Mario R Velasco, Justin D Floyd and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01416688 (S1013), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01416688 completednot on this map

S1013: A Prospective Study of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER-1/EGFR) Inhibitor-Induced Dermatologic Toxicity: Validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-EGFRI 18(FACT-EGFRI 18) Questionnaire for EGFRI-Induced Skin Toxicities

TypeobservationalSponsorSWOG Cancer Research NetworkRan2011 to 2019Enrolled146ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Dermatologic Complications, Lung Cancer, Therapy-related ToxicityArmsassessment of therapy complications, psychosocial assessment and care, quality-of-life assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Association between dermatologic adverse events and quality of life in lung cancer patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Siu-Fun WongChapman University School of Pharmacy, Rinker Health Science Campus, 9401 Jeronimo Road, Irvine, CA, USA. sfwong1120@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3884-2863
Joseph M UngerSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
James L WadeHeartland Cancer Research NCORP/Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL, USA.
Lynne I WagnerWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Mario E LacoutureMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Keisha C HumphriesHeartland Cancer Research NCORP/Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL, USA.
Anna MoseleySWOG Statistics and Data Management Center/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kathryn ArnoldSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mario R VelascoHeartland Cancer Research NCORP/Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL, USA.
Justin D FloydWichita NCORP, Wichita, KS, USA.
Benjamin T EsparazHeartland Cancer Research NCORP/Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL, USA.
Afsaneh BarziUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Heinz-Josef LenzUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Marianna Koczywas, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
Shaker DakhilWichita NCORP/ Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, Wichita, KS, USA.
Gary V BurtonGulf South MU NCORP/Louisiana State University HSC-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Michael J FischAim Specialty Health, Chicago, IL, USA.
N Lynn HenryUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Dawn L HershmanColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Carol M MoinpourFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Public Health Sciences Division (Emerita), Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
UM LAPs -UG1 GrantUG1CA233160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ANNE F SCHOTT · 2019 to 2026
$5.4M
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute UG1CA189974NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPapulopustular rash is a common class effect of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRI) that can affect patients' health-related quality of life and cause disruptions to treatment. SWOG S1013 (NCT01416688) is a multi-center study designed to validate the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy EGFRI 18 (FACT-EGFRI 18) using 7-items from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 to assess EGFRI-induced skin-related toxicities and their impact on functional status.

methodsPatients with a diagnosis of colorectal or lung cancer to receive EGFRI therapies for at least 6 weeks were enrolled. Patient self-assessments using the FACT-EGFRI 18 were completed prior to undergoing CTCAE assessment by trained clinicians at baseline, weekly × 6, and then monthly × 3. The psychometric properties of the FACT-EGFRI 14 (skin toxicity items only) and 18 (plus 2 nail and 2 hair items) were established based on criterion validity, known groups validity, internal consistency reliability, and responsiveness to change.

resultsOf the 146 registered patients, 124 were evaluable. High Cronbach's alpha (> 0.70) for both FACT-EGFRI 14 and FACT-EGFRI 18 scores across assessment times were observed. Although agreement (i.e. criterion validity) between individual and summary scales of the FACT-EGFRI 18 for assessing skin toxicity was good, agreement with the clinician-reported CTCAE was only fair. The minimal important difference was determined to be 3 points. The results also demonstrated responsiveness to symptom change. DISCUSSION: Based on the results of this multi-center validation study, the FACT-EGFRI 18 patient-reported outcome instrument provided data from the patient's perspective yielding unique information as well as complementing clinician-rated CTCAE grades, especially for the symptoms of pain, pruritus, and paronychia.

conclusionsGood to excellent psychometric properties for the FACT-EGFRI 18 were demonstrated, supporting further use of this patient-reported outcomes measure. Additional validation with a more diverse group of patients should be conducted.

Indexed as

Dermatologic toxicityEGFRIFACT-EGFRI 18Health-related quality of lifeHRQLPapulopustular rashPatient-reported outcome measure

Identifiers

PMID32642992
PMCPMC7343679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.