ArticleAdvances in therapy2020
Patient Burden and Real-World Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression: Results from an Online Survey of Patients with Solid Tumors.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Trilaciclib for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression in Patients With Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of trilaciclib to prevent chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in advanced solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Pooled it
- Grade ≥ 3 hematologic adverse events of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of Trilaciclib in preventing chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Acupuncture in Relieving Chemotherapy-induced Leukopenia in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review With A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.Integrative cancer therapiesPooled it
- STELLAR: Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Eflornithine Plus Lomustine Versus Lomustine Alone in Patients With Recurrent Grade 3 Astrocytoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of TiaoPi AnChang decoction to reduce CAPOX-Induced adverse reactions in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Trial
- First-Line Mobocertinib Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients WithJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: phase 3 PRESERVE 1 trial.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Trial
- Chinese herbal medicine (JianPi-BuShen) and completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II and III colon cancer: A randomized clinical trial.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2024Trial
- Exploratory composite endpoint demonstrates benefit of trilaciclib across multiple clinically meaningful components of myeloprotection in patients with small cell lung cancer.International journal of cancer · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Predictive Model of Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression for Patients with Esophageal Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterTrial
- Hematologic Toxicities and Determinants Among Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel in Northwest Ethiopia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity in cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Avatrombopag Versus Placebo for Persistent Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia in GI Cancers: The Phase II ACT-GI Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Article
- Phase I Study of Telisotuzumab Adizutecan (Temab-A, ABBV-400), a Novel c-Met Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients With Late-Line Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Solid Tumors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Article
- Myeloprotection effect of trilaciclib in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a real-world retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Improving severity grading of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in AML via data-driven and model-based deep learning.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in colorectal cancer patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChemotherapy-induced myelosuppression (CIM) is one of the most common dose-limiting complications of cancer treatment, and is associated with a range of debilitating symptoms that can significantly impact patients' quality of life. The purpose of this study was to understand patients' perspectives on how the side effects of CIM are managed in routine clinical practice.
methodsAn online survey was conducted of participants with breast, lung, or colorectal cancer who had received chemotherapy treatment within the past 12 months, and had experienced at least one episode of myelosuppression in the past year. The survey was administered with predominantly close-ended questions, and lay definitions of key terms were provided to aid response selection.
resultsOf 301 participants who completed the online survey, 153 (51%) had breast cancer, 100 (33%) had lung cancer, and 48 (16%) had colorectal cancer. Anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia were reported by 61%, 59%, 37%, and 34% of participants, respectively. Most participants (79%) reported having received treatment for CIM, and 64% of participants recalled chemotherapy dose modifications as a result of CIM. Although most participants believed their oncologist was aware of the side effects of CIM, and treated them quickly, 30% of participants felt their oncologists did not understand how uncomfortable they were due to the side effects of CIM. Overall, 88% of participants considered CIM to have a moderate or major impact on their lives.
conclusionThe data highlight that despite the various methods used to address CIM, and the patient-focused approach of oncologists, the real-world impact of CIM on patients is substantial. Improving communication between patients and health care providers may help improve patients' understanding of CIM, and foster shared decision-making in terms of treatment. Additional insights from patients should be obtained to further elucidate the totality of life burden associated with CIM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.