Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642892›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Migration of phthalates from PET water bottle in events of repeated uses and associated risk assessment.

Mahesh Jayaweera, Hasini Perera, Nilanthi Bandara, Gimhani Danushika, Buddhika Gunawardana, Chandani Somaratne, Jagath Manatunge, Kasun Zoysa, Thilini Thathsara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mahesh JayaweeraDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. mahesh@uom.lk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7686-3601
Hasini PereraDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Science, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
Nilanthi BandaraDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Science, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
Gimhani DanushikaDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.
Buddhika GunawardanaDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.
Chandani SomaratneDivision of Polymer and Chemical Engineering Technology, Institute of Technology, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.
Jagath ManatungeDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.
Kasun ZoysaDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.
Thilini ThathsaraDivision of Polymer and Chemical Engineering Technology, Institute of Technology, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.
University of Moratuwa · LKUniversity of Sri Jayewardenepura · LK

Funding

National Research Council Sri Lanka 15-056 and 12-086University Research Grant of University of Sri Jayewardenepura ASP/01/RE/SCI/2017/12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phthalates are widely used as a plasticizer in manufacturing polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles to improve softness, flexibility, durability, longevity, and workability. Phthalates are known in instigating profound human health hazards. In many developing countries, lack of proper disposal facilities established for empty PET bottles and the absence of legislation on reuse invariably persuade people to reuse them for storing potable water. An experiment was conducted with two commercial brands of PET bottles to explore the potential of phthalate migration when domestically refilled and reused in multiple times at two temperature conditions. Temperatures of ambient (27 ± 2 °C) and warm (60 ± 2 °C) were selected as the refilling temperatures because of the common practice by people. For both brands, only bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) levels were detected in refilled water in every event of reuse. For both brands, mean DEHP levels migrated to water at 60 ± 2 °C were significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to those at 27 ± 2 °C. Risk analyses carried out on human health suggested that there exist no definite acute or chronic health risks when the refilled water is consumed continuously for 30 years for both temperatures. Still, such risks were higher for the consumption of refilled water of warm temperatures than those of ambient temperature. However, this study elucidates that DEHP migration would be at an alarming rate when the events of reuse of a single bottle increase so that regulations banning the reuse of empty PET bottles are paramount, especially for developing countries.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterHumansPhthalic AcidsPolyethylene TerephthalatesRisk AssessmentDrinking Waterphthalic acidPhthalic AcidsPolyethylene TerephthalatesDEHPPlasticizerPolyethylene terephthalateReuseRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID32642892
OpenAlexW3041991753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.