Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642867›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2020

Development of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) system to aid the management of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

Derek Kyte, Nicola Anderson, Ram Auti, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Jon Bishop, Andrew Bissell, Elizabeth Brettell, Melanie Calvert, Marie Chadburn, Paul Cockwell and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Using a multi-stakeholder co-design process to develop a health service organisation-wide patient reported outcome measure collection system.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Derek KyteCentre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. d.g.kyte@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7679-6741
Nicola AndersonCentre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ram AutiUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Olalekan Lee AiyegbusiCentre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jon BishopBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit (BCTU), Institute of Applied Health Research University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Andrew BissellPatient Advisory Group, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Elizabeth BrettellBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit (BCTU), Institute of Applied Health Research University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Melanie CalvertCentre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Marie ChadburnBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit (BCTU), Institute of Applied Health Research University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Paul CockwellUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Mary DuttonUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Helen EddingtonUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Elliot ForsterUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Gabby HadleyUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Natalie J IvesCentre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Louise JacksonHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sonja O'BrienPatient Advisory Group, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gary PriceCentre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Keeley SharpePatient Advisory Group, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Stephanie StringerUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Gael StephensonUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Rav VerdiPatient Advisory Group, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Judi WatersPatient Advisory Group, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Adrian WilcocksonBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit (BCTU), Institute of Applied Health Research University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jim WilliamsUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBNIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2016-09-009National Institute for Health Research PDF-2016-09-009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective management of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) relies on timely detection of clinical deterioration towards end stage kidney failure. We aimed to design an electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (ePROM) system, which would allow patients with advanced CKD (pre-dialysis) to: (i) remotely self-report their symptoms using a simple and secure online platform; (ii) share the data with the clinical team in real-time via the electronic patient record to help optimise care. We adopted a staged development process which included: a systematic review of PROMs used in CKD; formation of a co-design team; prototype system design/development, user acceptance testing and refinement; finalisation of the system for testing in a pilot/feasibility trial.

resultsA co-design team was convened, including patients with lived experience of CKD; clinical team members; IT/Informatics experts; academics; and Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit representatives. A prototype system was developed and iterative changes made before finalisation during a series of operational meetings. The system allows patients to remotely self-report their symptoms; provides tailored self-management advice; allows monitoring of real-time patient ePROM data; sends automated notifications to the patient/clinical team in the advent of a severe symptom report; and incorporates longitudinal ePROM symptom data into the electronic patient record. Feasibility of the system will be evaluated as part of the National Institute for Health Research funded RePROM (Renal electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure) pilot trial (ISRCTN12669006).

conclusionsRoutine ePROM collection with real-time feedback has the potential to improve outcomes and reduce health service costs. We have successfully developed a trial-ready ePROM system for advanced CKD, the feasibility of which is currently being explored in a pilot trial. Assuming feasibility is demonstrated, formal evaluation of efficacy will take place in a future multi-centre randomised controlled trial.

Indexed as

Chronic kidney diseasePatient-reported outcomesSymptom monitoring

Identifiers

PMID32642867
PMCPMC7343684
OpenAlexW3040977352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.