ReviewEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2020
A method overview in smart aquaculture.
Review in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptive Recognition of Bioacoustic Signals in Smart Aquaculture Engineering Based on r-Sigmoid and Higher-Order Cumulants.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aquaculture is an important part of agricultural economy. In the past, major farming accidents often occurred due to subjective experience. There are many factors affecting the water quality of aquaculture. Maintaining an ecological environment with good water quality is the most critical link to ensure the production efficiency and quality of aquaculture. With the continuous development of science and technology, intelligence and informatization in aquaculture has become a new trend. Smart aquaculture cannot only realize real-time monitoring, prediction, warning, and risk control of the physical and chemical factors of the aquaculture environment but can also conduct real-time monitoring of the characteristics and behaviors of the fish, which infers the changes of the aquaculture ecological environment. In this paper, the research achievements over past two decades both are summarized from four aspects: water quality factor acquisition and pre-processing, water quality factor prediction, morphological characteristics, and behavioral characteristic recognition of fish and the mechanism between fish behavior and water quality factors. The advantages and disadvantages of existing research routes, algorithm models, and research methods in smart aquaculture are summarized. The work in this paper can provide a well-organized and summative knowledge reference for further study on the dynamic mechanism between the changes of water quality factors and the fish body characteristics and behavior. Meanwhile, the work can also provide valuable reference for promoting the smart, ecological, and efficient development of aquaculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32642861What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.