ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Value of [
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic Heterogeneity in High-Grade Glioma Assessed by Multi-Tracer PET and Ex Vivo Metabolomics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Complex Diagnostic Challenges in Glioblastoma: The Role ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A review of harmonization strategies for quantitative PET.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- Visualization of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targets in Glioma With Molecular Imaging.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTreatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with bevacizumab can induce MRI changes that confound the determination of progression. We sought to determine the value of [
methodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent brain FDG PET within 4 weeks of receiving bevacizumab for recurrent GBM with suspected progression. Volumes-of-interest were placed over the reference lesion with measurement of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV
resultsThirty-one patients were analyzed. Qualitative FDG uptake was significantly associated with OS (
conclusionFDG PET is a promising imaging tool to further stratify prognosis in recurrent GBM patients on antiangiogenic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.