Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642695›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Circulating angiogenic cells in glioblastoma: toward defining crucial functional differences in CAC-induced neoplastic versus reactive neovascularization.

Karin Huizer, Andrea Sacchetti, Sigrid Swagemakers, Peter J van der Spek, Wim Dik, Dana A Mustafa, Johan M Kros

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karin HuizerLaboratory for Tumor Immuno-Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrea SacchettiLaboratory for Tumor Immuno-Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sigrid SwagemakersDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Bio-Informatics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter J van der SpekDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Bio-Informatics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim DikDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dana A MustafaLaboratory for Tumor Immuno-Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan M KrosLaboratory for Tumor Immuno-Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to identify suitable therapeutic targets for glioma anti-angiogenic therapy, the process of neovascularization mediated by circulating angiogenic cells (CACs) needs to be scrutinized.

methodsIn the present study, we compared the expression of neovascularization-related genes by 3 circulating CAC subsets (hematopoietic progenitor cells [HPCs], CD34

resultsWe found essential differences in gene expression between GBM and MI CACs. GBM CACs had a higher expression of proangiogenic factors (especially,

conclusionsOur findings indicate that CAC-mediated neovascularization in GBM is characterized by more efficient CAC homing to target tissue and a more potent proangiogenic response than in physiologic tissue repair in MI. Our findings can aid in selecting targets for therapeutic strategies acting against GBM-specific CACs.

Indexed as

angiogenesiscirculating angiogenic cellendothelial progenitor cellgliomahematopoietic progenitor cellmyocardial infarctionneovascularization

Identifiers

PMID32642695
PMCPMC7276933
OpenAlexW3014795411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.