Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642693›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Bevacizumab-based treatment as salvage therapy in patients with recurrent symptomatic brain metastases.

Anna Sophie Berghoff, Michael Oliver Breckwoldt, Lars Riedemann, Kianush Karimian-Jazi, Sarah Loew, Franziska Schlieter, Julia Furtner, Marc Cinci, Michael Thomas, Moritz J Strowitzki and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Src inhibitor peptide TAT-Cx43Neuro-oncology advances
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna Sophie BerghoffDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael Oliver BreckwoldtDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lars RiedemannClinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Kianush Karimian-JaziDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sarah LoewClinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Franziska SchlieterDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Julia FurtnerComprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marc CinciDepartment of Medical Oncology and Internal Medicine VI, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael ThomasDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg and Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Moritz J StrowitzkiDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frederik MarméNational Center for Tumor Disease, Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Laura L MichelNational Center for Tumor Disease, Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas SchmidtDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dirk JägerDepartment of Medical Oncology and Internal Medicine VI, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias PreusserDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang WickClinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Frank WinklerClinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSalvage treatment for recurrent brain metastases (BM) of solid cancers is challenging due to the high symptomatic burden and the limited local treatment options.

methodsPatients with recurrent BM with no option for further local therapies were retrospectively identified from BM databases. Bevacizumab-based treatment was initiated as a salvage treatment. Radiological imaging before and after bevacizumab-based treatment was reevaluated for treatment response using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) BM criteria.

resultsTwenty-two patients (36.4% male) with recurrent BM from breast cancer (40.9%), colorectal cancer (31.8%), or lung cancer (27.3%) were identified. Previous BM-directed therapies were radiosurgery in 16/22 (72.7%) patients, whole-brain radiotherapy in 8/22 (36.4%), and neurosurgical resection in 11/22 (50.0%). Time since BM diagnosis to initiation of bevacizumab treatment was 16.5 months. Of 22 patients 14 (63.6%) received concurrent systemic therapies. Neurological symptom improvement could be achieved in 14/22 (63.6%) and stabilization in 6/22 (27.3%) patients, resulting in a clinical benefit in 20/22 (90.9%) patients. Steroids could be reduced or stopped in 15/22 (68.2%) patients. Rate of improvement on T1-weighted imaging was 15/19 (78.9%; median reduction: -26.0% ± 32.9) and 19/20 (95%; median reduction: -36.2% ± 22.2) on T2-weighted FLAIR imaging. According to RANO-BM best response was partial response in 7/19 (36.8%), stable disease in 9/19 (47.3%), and progressive disease in 3/19 (15.7%) patients. Median CNS-specific progression-free survival was 8 months and median overall survival after initiation of bevacizumab treatment was 17 months.

conclusionsBevacizumab-based treatment had clinically relevant intracranial activity in the vast majority of patients suffering from recurrent, symptomatic BM. The data supports a prospective clinical trial of bevacizumab as a salvage treatment in BM.

Indexed as

bevacizumabbrain edemabrain metastasesrecurrencesteroids

Identifiers

PMID32642693
PMCPMC7212911
OpenAlexW3011210243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.