ArticleContraception: X2020
Change and stability in contraceptive use patterns among US women over a 12-month period: analysis using the 2013-2015 National Survey of Family Growth life history calendar.
Article in Contraception: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo improve understanding of contraceptive use over 1 year among women in the United States. STUDY
designWe used the 2013-2015 National Survey of Family Growth to examine monthly contraceptive use patterns over a 12-month period. We focused on use of contraception during months in which non-sterilized women were sexually active and not pregnant; our outcomes were contraceptive use in every month, some months, and no months. We used simple and multivariate logistic regression to examine socio-demographic and method use characteristics associated with contraceptive use patterns.
resultsSome 72% of non-pregnant, non-surgically sterile women used contraception in every sexually active month. After controlling for other demographic and individual characteristics, adolescents had higher odds (aOR = 2.45) of using contraception in each sexually active month compared to women aged 25-29. Other groups more likely to use contraception monthly included those with some college (aOR = 1.58) compared to less than high school and non-cohabiting unmarried women (aOR = 1.49) compared to married women. Those with gaps in insurance coverage during the past year (aOR = 0.70), women who were not sexually active all 12 months (aOR = 0.42), and those with more than two male sexual partners (aOR = 0.49), were less likely to use contraception every sexually active month. Nearly half (46%) of contraceptive users in our sample used more than one type of contraceptive method over the 12-month period.
conclusionsThe majority of women use contraception every month they are sexually active, although there is variation between socio-demographic groups. However, over a one-year period, many women used dynamic contraceptive strategies. IMPLICATIONS: Health care providers should recognize that contraceptive use patterns are dynamic and change over a relatively short time period for many women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.