Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642640›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2020

Comparative proteomic analysis of human mesenchymal stromal cell behavior on calcium phosphate ceramics with different osteoinductive potential.

Z Othman, R J C Mohren, B Cillero-Pastor, Z Shen, Y S N W Lacroix, A P M Guttenplan, Z Tahmasebi Birgani, L Eijssen, T M Luider, S van Rijt and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Proteomic evaluation of human osteoblast responses to titanium implants over time.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2023
    Article
  7. 0.7Pb(MgMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A Review of Recent Developments in the Molecular Mechanisms of Bone Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Z OthmanMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Department of Instructive Biomaterials Engineering, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
R J C MohrenThe Maastricht Multimodal Molecular Imaging Institute (M4I), Division of Imaging Mass Spectrometry, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
B Cillero-PastorThe Maastricht Multimodal Molecular Imaging Institute (M4I), Division of Imaging Mass Spectrometry, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Z ShenMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Department of Instructive Biomaterials Engineering, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Y S N W LacroixMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Department of Instructive Biomaterials Engineering, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
A P M GuttenplanMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Department of Instructive Biomaterials Engineering, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Z Tahmasebi BirganiMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Department of Instructive Biomaterials Engineering, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
L EijssenDepartment of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
T M LuiderLaboratory of Neuro-Oncology and Clinical and Cancer Proteomics, Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
S van RijtMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Department of Instructive Biomaterials Engineering, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
P HabibovicMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Department of Instructive Biomaterials Engineering, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, synthetic calcium phosphate (CaP) ceramics have emerged as an alternative to bone grafts in the treatment of large critical-sized bone defects. To successfully substitute for bone grafts, materials must be osteoinductive, that is, they must induce osteogenic differentiation and subsequent bone formation

Indexed as

Bone graft substitutesNetwork analysisOsteoinductionProtein adsorptionProteomics

Identifiers

PMID32642640
PMCPMC7334494
OpenAlexW3037960933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.