ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2020
Cognitive and behavioral outcome of stereotactic laser amydalohippocampotomy in a pediatric setting.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychiatric changes after stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy for medial temporal lobe epilepsy.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2023Article
- Open surgery or laser interstitial thermal therapy for low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors of the temporal lobe: A single-institution consecutive series.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2022Article
- Cognitive and Emotional Mapping With SEEG.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We present neuropsychological and functional outcome data in a teenager undergoing stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH) who had drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy due to left hippocampal sclerosis. Given strong baseline cognitive performance, there was concern for post-operative declines in language and verbal memory were this patient to undergo open resection. She was evaluated pre- and post-ablation with clinical and experimental neuropsychological measures including semantic memory, category-specific object/face recognition and naming, spatial learning, and socio-emotional processing. The patient became seizure-free following SLAH and experienced significant improvements in school performance and social engagement. She experienced improvement in recognition and naming of multiple object categories, memory functions, and verbal fluency. In contrast, the patient declined significantly in her ability to recognize emotional tone from facial expressions, a socio-emotional process that had been normal prior to surgery. We believe this decline was related to surgical disruption of the limbic system, an area highly involved in emotional processing, and suspect such deficits are an under-assessed and unrecognized risk for all surgeries involving the amygdalohippocampal complex and broader limbic system regions. We hope this positive SLAH outcome will serve as impetus for group level research to establish its safety and efficacy in the pediatric setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.