Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642623›Full record

ArticleVideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2020

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic laser lithotripsy and lithotomy through the lumen-apposing metal stent for giant gallbladder stones.

Wei Wang, Bowei Liu, Ke Qi, Xingang Shi, Zhendong Jin, Zhaoshen Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Successful minimally invasive management of adverse events following EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in a suboptimal surgical patient.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Bowei LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan, China.
Ke QiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xingang ShiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhendong JinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhaoshen LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Second Military Medical University · CNZhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsEUS-guided gallbladder drainage has been increasingly applied for acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. In cases of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs), endoscopic retrieval of gallstones becomes feasible. However, retrieval of giant gallstones is still difficult because of the limited space in the saddle section of the LAMS. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic laser lithotripsy and lithotomy through LAMSs for the removal of giant gallstones.

methodsFive consecutive patients with recurrent cholecystitis due to giant gallstones were enrolled. We proceeded with EUS-guided LAMS implantation. Endoscopic laser lithotripsy and lithotomy then was performed through the LAMSs, and the stents were removed after all stones were extracted. The patients were followed up at scheduled times.

resultsEUS-guided LAMS implantation was successfully performed, and target gallstones were completely removed in all 5 patients. There was no severe bleeding, perforation, or stent migration during the operation. No recurrence of gallstones was found at late follow-up.

conclusionsEndoscopic laser lithotripsy and lithotomy through LAMSs could be a safe and effective approach for removal of giant gallstones.

Indexed as

ELLL, endoscopic laser lithotripsy and lithotomyLAMSs, lumen-apposing metal stents

Identifiers

PMID32642623
PMCPMC7332785
OpenAlexW3023669011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.