Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642534›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2020

Versatility of the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap for surgical reconstruction, a case series.

Christoffer Bing Madsen, Jens Ahm Sørensen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Chimeric Antero-Lateral Thigh Flap and Vastus Lateralis Muscle Flap for the Infratemporal Fossa Reconstruction in Oral Cancer Defects.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  5. Role of ALT Perforator Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pedicled anterolateral thigh flap: A versatile flap for complex regional defect reconstruction.GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Free Your Mind, Not Your Flap.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christoffer Bing MadsenUniversity of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark.
Jens Ahm SørensenUniversity of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pedicled anterolateral thigh flap is a versatile flap that offers many advantages. These include a long and reliable pedicle that enables a wide arch of rotation, the possibility to harvest a large skin area, raising the flap with underlying fascia and muscle and minimal donor site morbidity.

methodsFrom 2009 to 2018 nine patients were reconstructed with a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap. The flap was applied for coverage of knee infections, trochanteric defects, an abdominal defect, a gluteal defect, and a defect of the inguinal region. The patient group consisted of five males and four females. The age range was 30-90 years with a mean age of 61 years.

resultsFlap size ranged from 10 x 5 cm (50 cm

conclusionOur experience illustrates the versatility in the clinical application of the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap. The many advantages of the flap, such as the long and reliable pedicle, a large area of skin that can be harvested, the potential to supercharge the flap and the minimal donor site morbidity highlights the diversity of defects that can be reconstructed using this flap.

Indexed as

Alt flapClinical applicationDistally basedPedicled anterolateral thigh flapReconstructionVenous supercharge

Identifiers

PMID32642534
PMCPMC7334399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.