ArticleData in brief2020
2D and 3D graphical datasets for bamboo-inspired tubular scaffolds with functional gradients: micrographs and tomograms.
Article in Data in brief, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tensile properties of freeze-cast collagen scaffolds: How processing conditions affect structure and performance in the dry and fully hydrated states.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Presented in this article are 2D and 3D graphical datasets in the form of micrographs and tomograms that were obtained as part of a systematic microstructural characterization by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microtomography to illustrate freeze-cast bamboo-inspired tubular scaffolds with functional gradients ("Bamboo-inspired Tubular Scaffolds with Functional Gradients" [1]). Four material combinations of the coaxial 'core-shell' molds and their two end pieces were used to freeze cast highly porous tubes (Tube/Rod/Holder): ASA (Aluminum, 316 Stainless Steel, Aluminum), ASP (Aluminum, 316 Stainless Steel, Epoxy (Plastic)), SCA (316 Stainless Steel, Copper, Aluminum), and CSP (Copper, 316 Stainless Steel, Epoxy (Plastic)). Three techniques were used to coat the best performing CSP freeze-cast tubes: spray freezing (SF), spray coating (SC), and brush freezing (BF). The structure and density profile of the uncoated and coated tubes was quantified using X-ray microtomography and their functional gradients, and the resulting mechanical performance in bending were determined and compared. The structure-property-processing correlations determined for the coated and uncoated coaxially freeze cast tubular scaffolds offer strategies for the biomimetic design of bamboo-inspired porous tubes, which emulate bamboo's stiff outer shell supported by a porous, elastic inner layer to delay the onset of ovalization and failure, thereby increasing the tubes' mechanical efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.