ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2020
Endotracheal intubation training to medical practitioners: Comparison of the modified 4-step Payton's training method and Halsted's training method in a simulated environment.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of a modified Peyton's four-step teaching method on orthokeratology skills: an experimental study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparing hoarseness and sore throat after extubation at different endotracheal cuff pressures: A double-blinded clinical trial.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Review
- Stepwise approach to skills teaching in resuscitation: A systematic review.Resuscitation plus · 2023Review
- From the Difficult Airway Management to Diagnosis of Retropharyngeal Synovial Cell Carcinoma.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe ability of physicians to perform endotracheal intubation by laryngoscope is one of the essential skills. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the four-step python training method with the Halsted's "See one, Do one, and Teach one" training method in endotracheal intubation competency in simulated environment. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis quasi-experimental study was performed on two independent groups with posttest. The statistical society consisted of eighth-semester medical students referred to the emergency medicine unit. The experimental group received a modified four-step python's training method that modified for small groups, and the control group received the Halsted's "See one, Do one, and Teach one" training method. Researcher-made checklist used to rate participant competency as posttest. Data were analyzed using SPSS 19 software.
resultsSixty-seven students volunteered for the experimental group and 57 students for the control group. In posttest, the experimental group more competent than the control group significantly ( DISCUSSION AND
conclusionModified python training method for small groups has shown a better effect on student performance. This finding is consistent with previous researches. Modified four-step python's training for small group with an emphasis on peer to peer teaching and receiving feedback from peer can be related to the effectiveness of this training. Further research is recommended in other clinical education settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.