Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642451›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2020

Methods for preprocessing time and distance series data from personal monitoring devices.

Tomasz Wiktorski, Magnus Bjørkavoll-Bergseth, Stein Ørn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tomasz WiktorskiUniversity of Stavanger, Norway.
Magnus Bjørkavoll-BergsethStavanger University Hospital, Norway.
Stein ØrnStavanger University Hospital, Norway.
Stavanger University Hospital · NOUniversity of Stavanger · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need to develop more advanced tools to improve guidance on physical exercise to reduce risk of adverse events and improve benefits of exercise. Vast amounts of data are generated continuously by Personal Monitoring Devices (PMDs) from sports events, biomedical experiments, and fitness self-monitoring that may be used to guide physical exercise. Most of these data are sampled as time- or distance-series. However, the inherent high-dimensionality of exercise data is a challenge during processing. As a result, current data analysis from PMDs seldomly extends beyond aggregates. Common challanges are:•alterations in data density comparing the time- and the distance domain;•large intra and interindividual variations in the relationship between numerical data and physiological properties;•alterations in temporal statistical properties of data derived from exercise of different exercise durations. These challenges are currently unresolved leading to suboptimal analytic models. In this paper, we present algorithms and approaches to address these problems, allowing the analysis of complete PMD datasets, rather than having to rely on cumulative statistics. Our suggested approaches permit effective application of established Symbolic Aggregate Approximation modeling and newer deep learning models, such as LSTM.

Indexed as

Distance seriesSAXSports eventsSymbolic aggregate approximationTime series

Identifiers

PMID32642451
PMCPMC7334486
OpenAlexW3034537104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.