Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642442›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology2020

Pre-operative MRI measurements versus anthropometric data: Which is more accurate in predicting 4-stranded hamstring graft size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Lynn Thwin, Sean Wl Ho, Teong Jin Lester Tan, Wei Yang Lim, Keng Thiam Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lynn ThwinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Sean Wl HoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Teong Jin Lester TanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Wei Yang LimDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Keng Thiam LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveGraft diameter has been shown to play an important role in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) autograft failure rates. The roles of pre-operative MRI measurement of graft size and anthropometric data have been studied in the prediction of hamstring graft size. Pre-operative knowledge of hamstring graft diameter allows surgeons to perform better surgical planning and provides an opportunity to discuss with patients on alternative graft options such as allografts should the need arises. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of pre-operative anthropometric data and MRI measurements in the prediction of 4-stranded hamstring autograft size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

methodThis was a cohort study involving 141 subjects (115 males and 26 females) who underwent a single bundle ACL reconstruction utilising a 4-stranded hamstring graft by a single surgeon from 2008 to 2012. Pre-operatively, the height, weight, body mass index (BMI), age, gender and smoking status was recorded. The MRI scans used for diagnosis were utilized to measure the gracilis (GT) and semi-tendinosus (ST) cross sectional area (CSA).

resultWe found the strongest correlation between Combined (ST + GT) CSA and intra-operative graft size (r = 0.596, p < 0.001). This was followed by ST CSA (r = 0.570,p < 0.001), Body surface area (r = 0.507,p < 0.001), and GT CSA (r = 0.460,p < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between 2 anthropometric data (Age and BMI). There was also no significant difference between different strengths of MRIs (1.5T vs 3.0T) in determining the intra-operative graft size (p = 0.438).

conclusionWe conclude that pre-operative MRI is superior to anthropometric variables in predicting the size of 4-stranded hamstring autografts used in ACL reconstruction.

Indexed as

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionAnthropometric measurementsGraft sizeMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID32642442
PMCPMC7321968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.