Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642292›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2020

Overall survival, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: before and after propensity score matching analysis of a cohort study.

Jiaqiang Zhang, Lei Qin, Ho-Min Chen, Han-Chuan Hsu, Chih-Chi Chuang, Dar Chen, Szu-Yuan Wu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiaqiang ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Lei QinSchool of Statistics, University of International Business and Economics Beijing, China.
Ho-Min ChenBig Data Center, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital Yilan, Taiwan.
Han-Chuan HsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital Yilan, Taiwan.
Chih-Chi ChuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital Yilan, Taiwan.
Dar ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital Yilan, Taiwan.
Szu-Yuan WuBig Data Center, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital Yilan, Taiwan.
Henan Provincial People's Hospital · CNTaipei Medical University · TWUniversity of International Business and Economics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo estimate the outcomes of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for bulky or advanced-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC). PATIENTS AND

methodsWe enrolled patients who had been diagnosed as having cervical SCC or ADC and received definitive CCRT. A Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI); independent predictors were stratified or controlled for in the analysis, and the endpoint was all-cause mortality among patients with cervical SCC and ADC who received CCRT. Propensity score matching was performed to create well-balanced groups.

resultswe enrolled 3258 patients who had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer without distant metastasis. Among them, 2927 patients with cervical SCC and 331 patients with cervical ADC received definitive CCRT. The results of multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that ADC, advanced FIGO stage, no intracavitary brachytherapy, old age, earlier year of diagnosis, and higher comorbidity scores were significant independent poor prognostic factors of all-cause mortality in patients with cervical cancer who received definitive CCRT. Patients with cervical ADC who received definitive CCRT had higher all-cause mortality, locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis (DM) (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 2.10 [1.79-2.46], 1.79 [1.35-2.37], and 1.97 [1.54-2.53] for all-cause mortality, LRR, and DM, respectively) compared with patients with cervical SCC who received CCRT.

conclusionDefinitive CCRT in patients with cervical ADC resulted in lower overall survival, higher LRR, and higher DM rate compared with patients with cervical SCC.

Indexed as

adenocarcinomaCervical cancerconcurrent chemoradiotherapysquamous cell carcinomasurvival

Identifiers

PMID32642292
PMCPMC7339279
OpenAlexW3041564551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.