ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2020
Outcome patterns of cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma following curative surgery: before and after propensity score matching analysis of a cohort study.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival effect of pre-RT PET-CT on cervical cancer: Image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy era.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- The Association of Preoperative PET-CT and Survival in Patients with Resectable Cervical Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Endocrine Therapy for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast With High Hormone Receptor Positivity and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Negativity.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Contemporary external beam radiotherapy boost or high dose-rate brachytherapy boost for cervical cancer: a propensity-score-matched, nationwide, population-based cohort study.American journal of cancer research · 2021Article
- Insufficient pain control for patients with cancer and dementia during terminal cancer stages.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Local and Systemic STAT3 and p65 NF-KappaB Expression as Progression Markers and Functional Targets for Patients With Cervical Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To estimate the outcome patterns and predictors of curative surgery for cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) for overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis (DM), we enrolled 4628 patients who had received a diagnosis of cervical SCC or ADC and received curative surgery. Cox regression analysis was employed to calculate hazard ratios and confidence intervals (CIs); independent predictors were controlled for or stratified in the analysis, and the endpoint was all-cause death. Propensity score matching was conducted to create well-balanced groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the pathologic type of ADC, age ≥ 70 years, advanced pathologic stage, positive margin, poorly differentiated cancer, undifferentiated cancer, adjuvant sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy, earlier year of diagnosis, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) = 1, CCI ≥ 2, low income levels, and treatment at a nonmedical center were significant independent poor prognostic factors for all-cause mortality in cervical cancer treated with curative surgery. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) for patients with cervical ADC who received curative surgery were 2.34 (1.96-2.79), 1.15 (0.89-1.49), and 2.16 (1.75-2.66) compared with cervical SCC for all-cause mortality, LRR, and DM, respectively. This study indicated that curative surgery for cervical ADC was associated with poorer OS and higher DM rates relative to cervical SCC, but no significant differences were identified in LRR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32642291PMC7339276W3040702535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.