ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2020
How to identify intersegmental planes in performing sublobar anatomical resections.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05545085 (Thoracoscopic Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging for the Demarcation of Lung Segments), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Thoracoscopic Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging for the Demarcation of Lung Segments
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective comparison of three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography-assisted indocyanine green reverse staining versus modified inflation-deflation in robotic-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Reverse watershed method applied to thoracoscopic S9 segmentectomy: a retrospective study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- The benefits of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy combined with fluorescence-guided thoracoscopy in precise pulmonary segmentectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- The use of intravenous indocyanine green in minimally invasive segmental lung resections: a systematic review.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Review
- Three-dimensional imaging anatomical research and clinical implications of VThoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Robot-assisted segmentectomy with improved modified inflation-deflation combined with the intravenous indocyanine green method.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Clinical application of VATS combined with 3D-CTBA in anatomical basal segmentectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Identification of the intersegmental plane by arterial ligation method during thoracoscopic segmentectomy.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Size Measurement and Segmentectomy Resection Margin of Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma Manifesting on Virtual 3D Imagery and Pathology: A Pilot Correlation Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Division of the intersegmental demarcation using the "modified hand-tearing method" is safe and feasible in thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy.Thoracic cancer · 2022Article
- A novel system for analyzing indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence spectra enables deeper lung tumor localization during thoracoscopic surgery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- Long-Term Survival Following Minimally Invasive Lung Cancer Surgery: Comparing Robotic-Assisted and Video-Assisted Surgery.Cancers · 2022Article
- A novel localization technique for peripheral ground glass opacity using geometric parameters measured on CT images.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- The Role of Surgery in Lung Cancer Treatment: Present Indications and Future Perspectives-State of the Art.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary segmentectomy is a common surgical procedure in thoracic surgery nowadays. Though this technique helps preventing postoperative pulmonary function loss, potential challenges are the management of air leaks and the difficulty of palpating ground-glass components during surgery, as well as how to deal with the intersegmental planes. Several techniques have been proposed for the identification and treatment of the intersegmental planes during sublobar anatomical resections: this review focuses on preoperative planning and workup and intraoperative strategies. Three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA), virtual-assisted mapping (VAL-MAP) using bronchoscopy multi-spot dye marking and three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) are preoperative tools that may facilitate the planning of operation. Inflation-deflation techniques, infrared-fluorescence-enhanced method combined with bronchial and intravenous injection of indocyanine green (ICG) and near-infrared fluorescence (NIF) mapping with ICG have been described as intraoperative strategies to identify the intersegmental plane. The treatment and section of the intersegmental planes is mainly accomplished by stapler and electrocautery or energy devices. The use of staplers reduces postoperative air leaks, bleeding risks and operative time but seems to reduce preserved lung volume, compromising adjacent lung expansion; in addition, higher costs and sometimes non-adequate oncological margins, being a non-anatomical technique have been described. The electrocautery and energy devices allow for a more anatomical and precise dissection maintaining safe oncological margins, with a better lung expansion and so an increased postoperative lung function. Time consuming procedure and frequent requirement of aero-haemostatic tools to treat air and blood leaks are the main drawbacks. In conclusion, there are several methods to identify and treat the intersegmental planes but there are no significant differences between the different tools, therefore the use of one technique rather than another depends overall on surgeon's preference and the location of the segment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.