Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642244›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2020

3D printing in adult cardiovascular surgery and interventions: a systematic review.

Changtian Wang, Lei Zhang, Tao Qin, Zhilong Xi, Lei Sun, Haiwei Wu, Demin Li

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 3D Printing in Constrictive Pericarditis Assessment.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024
    Article
  18. 3D printing from transesophageal echocardiography for planning mitral paravalvular leak closure - feasibility study.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2023
    Article
  19. Editorial: Applications of 3D printing in cardiovascular medicine.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Changtian WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University, School Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China.
Lei ZhangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University, School Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China.
Tao QinDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University, School Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China.
Zhilong XiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University, School Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China.
Lei SunDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University, School Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China.
Haiwei WuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University, School Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China.
Demin LiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University, School Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China.
Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNNanjing University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D printing in adult cardiac and vascular surgery has been evaluated over the last 10 years, and all of the available literature reports benefits from the use of 3D models. In the present study, we analyzed the current applications of 3D printing for adult cardiovascular disease treated with surgical or catheter-based interventions, including the clinical medical simulation of physiological or pathology conducted with 3D printing in this field. A search of PubMed and MEDLINE databases were supplemented by searching through bibliographies of key articles. Thereafter, data on demographic, clinical scenarios and application, imaging modality, purposes of using with 3D printing, outcomes and follow-up were extracted. A total of 43 articles were deemed eligible and included. 296 patients (mean age: 65.4±14.2 years; male, 58.2%) received 3D printing for cardiac and vascular surgery or conditions [percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO), TAVR, mitral valve disease, aortic valve replacement, coronary artery abnormality, HOCM, aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection, Kommerell's diverticulum, primary cardiac tumor and ventricular aneurysm]. Eight papers reported the utility of 3D printing in the medical simulator and training fields. Most studies were conducted starting in 2014. Twenty-six was case report. The major scenario used with 3D printing technology was LAAO (50.3%) and followed by TAVR (17.6%). CT and echocardiography were two main imaging techniques that were used to generate 3D-printed heart models. All studies showed that 3D-printed models were helpful for preoperative planning, orientation, and medical teaching. The important finding is that 3D printing provides a unique patient-specific method to assess complex anatomy and is helpful for intraoperative orientation, decision-making, creating functional models, and teaching adult cardiac and vascular surgery, including catheter-based heart surgery.

Indexed as

adultcardiovascular surgeryinterventionThree-dimensional (3D) printing

Identifiers

PMID32642244
PMCPMC7330795
OpenAlexW3033361845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.