Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642163›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2020

Non-invasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure: pressure support ventilation

Hyunseung Nam, Jae Hwa Cho, Tai Sun Park, Sei Won Kim, Hyung Koo Kang, Yoon Mi Shin, Jae Joon Hwang, Kwangha Lee, Jick Hwan Ha, Young Seok Lee and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Hyunseung NamDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Jae Hwa ChoDepartment Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Tai Sun ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea.
Sei Won KimDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Hyung Koo KangDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Yoon Mi ShinDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea.
Jae Joon HwangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea.
Kwangha LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Jick Hwan HaDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Inchoen, Korea.
Young Seok LeeDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Youjin ChangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Inje University Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Sunghoon ParkDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Korean NIV Study Group
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRInje University Ilsan Paik Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital · KRYonsei University · KRHanyang University Guri Hospital · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRKyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong · KRPusan National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe best ventilator mode for patients receiving non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has not been clarified. This study compared the effectiveness of two pressure-targeted modes, i.e., pressure support ventilation (PSV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), in patients receiving NIV.

methodsThis was a prospective multicentre observational study of NIV use for acute respiratory failure (ARF) in adult patients. We compared the two pressure-targeted modes in terms of NIV success and complication rates.

resultsAmong 176 patients receiving NIV, 88 patients were included in the study (PCV mode, n=29; PSV mode, n=59). The study population had a median age of 73.0 years and median body mass index of 20.8 kg/m

conclusionsIn contrast to PCV mode, PSV mode was significantly associated with NIV success in the intensive care unit setting, particularly when large leaks were not a major concern. Nevertheless, further well-designed multicenter, protocol-driven randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Indexed as

acute respiratory failure (ARF)Non-invasive ventilation (NIV)treatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID32642163
PMCPMC7330335
OpenAlexW3015617866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.