Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642063›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational immunology2020

Mass cytometry reveals immune signatures associated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) control in recipients of allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplant and CMV-specific T cells.

Helen M McGuire, Simone Rizzetto, Barbara P Withers, Leighton E Clancy, Selmir Avdic, Lauren Stern, Ellis Patrick, Barbara Fazekas de St Groth, Barry Slobedman, David J Gottlieb and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Expansion of effector memory Vδ2Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  7. CARNature communications · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CyTOFFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Helen M McGuireRamaciotti Facility for Human Systems Biology The University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2047-6543
Simone RizzettoKirby Institute for Infection and Immunity University of New South Wales Sydney NSW Australia.
Barbara P WithersFaculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Camperdown NSW Australia.
Leighton E ClancySydney Cellular Therapies Laboratory Westmead NSW Australia.
Selmir AvdicFaculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Camperdown NSW Australia.
Lauren SternCharles Perkins Centre The University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia.
Ellis PatrickWestmead Institute for Medical Research The University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia.
Barbara Fazekas de St GrothRamaciotti Facility for Human Systems Biology The University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia.
Barry SlobedmanCharles Perkins Centre The University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia.
David J GottliebFaculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Camperdown NSW Australia.
Fabio LucianiKirby Institute for Infection and Immunity University of New South Wales Sydney NSW Australia.
Emily BlythFaculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Camperdown NSW Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7849-7139
The University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCytomegalovirus (CMV) is known to have a significant impact on immune recovery post-allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Adoptive therapy with donor-derived or third-party virus-specific T cells (VST) can restore CMV immunity leading to clinical benefit in prevention and treatment of post-HSCT infection. We developed a mass cytometry approach to study natural immune recovery post-HSCT and assess the mechanisms underlying the clinical benefits observed in recipients of VST.

methodsA mass cytometry panel of 38 antibodies was utilised for global immune assessment (72 canonical innate and adaptive immune subsets) in HSCT recipients undergoing natural post-HSCT recovery (

resultsMass cytometry identified distinct immune signatures associated with CMV characterised by a predominance of innate cells (monocytes and NK) seen early and an adaptive signature with activated CD8

conclusionThe clinical benefit of CMV-VST may be mediated by the recovery of an adaptive immune signature characterised by activated CD8

Indexed as

adoptive T‐cell therapyCyTOFhaemopoietic stem cell transplantimmune reconstitutionimmunotherapymass cytometry

Identifiers

PMID32642063
PMCPMC7332355
OpenAlexW3039642489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.