Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642061›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020

OMENTAL INFARCTION: SURGICAL or CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT? A CASE REPORTS and CASE SERIES SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

N A Medina-Gallardo, Y Curbelo-Peña, T Stickar, J Gardenyes, S Fernández-Planas, P Roura-Poch, H Vallverdú-Cartie

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N A Medina-GallardoDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Vic - Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Francesc Pla 'El Vigatà', 1, 08500, Vic, Spain.
Y Curbelo-PeñaDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Vic - Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Francesc Pla 'El Vigatà', 1, 08500, Vic, Spain.
T StickarDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Vic - Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Francesc Pla 'El Vigatà', 1, 08500, Vic, Spain.
J GardenyesDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Vic - Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Francesc Pla 'El Vigatà', 1, 08500, Vic, Spain.
S Fernández-PlanasDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Vic - Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Francesc Pla 'El Vigatà', 1, 08500, Vic, Spain.
P Roura-PochDepartment of Epidemiology, Hospital Universitari de Vic - Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Francesc Pla 'El Vigatà', 1, 08500, Vic, Spain.
H Vallverdú-CartieDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Vic - Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Francesc Pla 'El Vigatà', 1, 08500, Vic, Spain.
Hospital Universitari de Vic · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOmental infarction (OI) is an infrequent cause of acute abdominal pain and there is no consensus on whether conservative or surgical treatment is the best strategy when performing positive CT diagnosis.

objectivesTo assess which of the two treatments is the most commonly adopted and compare outcomes in terms of success rate in resolution of symptoms and hospital length of stay. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Case report and case series of patients with abdominal pain and positive diagnosis by CT of omental infarction. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Science Direct and Google Scholar in combination with cross-referencing searches and manual searches of eligible articles from January 2000 to June 2018.

participantsPatients older than 18 years of age.

methodsPatient characteristics and results were summarized descriptively. Categorical variables were assessed by chisquare test or Fischer's exact test, and continuous variables by the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test. Risk factors for failure of the conservative management were identified using multivariate logistic regression.

results90 articles were included in the final analysis (146 patients). 107 patients (73.3%) received conservative treatment with a failure rate of 15.9% (patients needing surgery) and 39 patients (26.7%) received surgery as first treatment. The mean hospital length of stay was 5.1 days for the conservative treatment group and 2.5 days for the surgery group with statistically significant differences (p = 0.00). Younger age and white blood cells count ≥12000/μl were predictive factors of conservative treatment failure.

conclusionsAlthough conservative treatment is effective in most patients, surgery has advantages in terms of hospital length of stay.

Indexed as

Acute abdominal painComputed tomographyConservative treatmentOmental infarctionSurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID32642061
PMCPMC7334794
OpenAlexW3037435895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.