Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32642026›Full record

ArticleCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2020

Mandibular Ramus Fractures: A Proposed Classification.

Padmanidhi Agarwal, Divya Mehrotra

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Padmanidhi AgarwalDepartment of Dentistry and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5409-0564
Divya MehrotraDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh · INKing George's Medical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe purpose of this article was to study and devise a classification of fracture patterns of the mandibular ramus to facilitate management.

methodsMandibular ramus fracture demographics in literature were reviewed along with evaluation of the patients diagnosed with mandibular ramus fractures who had reported to the emergency/outpatient clinic of our Institute in the last 5 years. Epidemiology of these ramus fractures was studied, and these ramus fractures were categorized into repetitive patterns on the basis of radiological observations in an effort to achieve a simplified classification.

resultsA total of 1372 trauma patients were diagnosed with mandibular fractures, of which an incidence of 2.4% was recorded for ramus fractures. These were predominantly in males and mainly due to road traffic accidents commonly in people driving two-wheeler vehicles (64%). Ramus fractures seldom occur in isolation. Five predictable fracture patterns were observed and accordingly classified as types I to V. Type I was the most common and type IV the least. Open reduction was done in 45.5% patients with non-compression plating systems. Satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcomes were achieved in all patients.

conclusionThe mandibular ramus fractures although rare need to be well understood and demarcated. The classification highlights the importance of this mandibular buttress and focuses on the importance of its technically and anatomically more complicated fracture treatment. Future studies are needed to compare the modalities of management.

Indexed as

classificationincidencemandiblemandibular fracturesopen fracture reductionramus

Identifiers

PMID32642026
PMCPMC7311852
OpenAlexW3005782809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.